Editing: Apple (FCP) or PC software

F

fourirenet

Member
Hi! I don't want to start the usual mac/pc fight here but I need to know...

A lot of people tell me that Final Cut Pro is amazing for editing. Me, im using Adobe Premiere pro on a PC. I think it works well for what i have to do right now. Im actually doing basic stuff, but Im using more and more effects with After Effect.

My question, is it worth the trouble to go to a mac instead of a PC? What it so amazing about FPC? I just stoped by an Apple store and I tried to navigate on the Final cut pro HD for 10 minutes, but I didn't discover any amazing features on it.

If I take a class on Final Cut Pro, is it gonna to be a waste of time or am is it gonna change my mind?
 
Sorry this is so long winded, but to nip some issues in the bud...

First of all, with the new Intel Macs, load up BootCamp and you have both worlds running great on one machine. There's no reason to chose one or the other. Get both, on a Mac!

FCP, like any NLE, isn't going to reveal it's details in a few minutes of you working with it. NLEs are complex beasts that take time to learn. I personally know 5 independent videographers here in south Louisiana who have switched from PPro to FCP in the last year and a half, all say the same thing. There's a few things that PPro does quicker, but those are novelty processes and they would not go back to PPro for them. They all are much happier on FCP.

One of them, a member of DVXuser.com here, even had a problem with his Mac a month or so ago. Called me, posted here, fixed his problem on his own eventually. To use his words, a problem that would have taken a couple of days to fix on his old Windows machine, took only a couple of hours to fix on his Mac. And this is a super smart guy who's super tech savey.

I have a healthy respect for PPro, but IMHO, it's more of a videography NLE. FCP is more film oriented. I bet you never got to do any keyframing, compositing, etc, with FCP while you were playing on it.

If you do go with FCP, I STRONGLY recommend the following books, all in the "Apple Pro Training Series" library:
APTS, Final Cut Pro (do this book on your own, rather than the official class)
APTS, Optimizing Your Final Cut Pro System
APTS, Compressor Quick-Reference Guide

There's also the "APTS, Advanced Color Correction and Effects in Final Cut Pro" that's really super good once you have the basics down.

Again, you'll never know anything about any solid NLE by just poking around by yourself for ten minutes.

And FWIW, Final Cut Pro HD hasn't been sold in a very long time. Technically that was version 4.0 and 4.5. The latest version, very advanced from those versions, is Final Cut Pro 5.1 (technically, 5.1.2).

So, get a Mac, run Windows as well (reportedly more stable) as OS X on one machine. Get the best of both worlds.

And if you go with PPro, that's fine. You have to go with what you're most comfortable with.

Be aware that some Apple Certified Trainers such as myself and Larry Jordan (who has a FANTASTIC free FCP newsletter and WONDERFUL subscription FCP professional journal) teach "seminars." These are usually shorter than the official Apple sactioned classes, cheaper, and cover things in a more personal way. I encourage all FCP users to subscribe to Larry's news letters. And to buy my own tutorials that go on sale mid Jan 07. And see if the town you live in has a local Final Cut Pro Users Group. I'm starting one here in New Orleans next month. They're fantastic places to learn and network.

http://www.larryjordan.biz/nxlttrs.html
http://www.peachpit.com/promotions/promotion.asp?promo=3468&redir=1&rl=1

One final note, I'm a retired IT Engineer. Started out as a bench tech fixing IBM Old Blue's, which were huge old blue cabinets the size of a refrigirator, with two 5MB hard drives, each the size of an SUV tire, and had not one "chip" in the whole thing. I finished as an IT Project Manager on enterprise scale broadband wireless projects, and held just about every position inbetween (except I was never a software engineer). In all those years, I'd come home and the LAST thing I wanted to do was fix my own equipment. I always came home to a Mac (my first was a Mac Plus with a Rodine 20MB hard drive the size of a VCR and as loud as a 747 taking off, 8Mhz CPU, state of the art for it's time). Yep, always came home to a Mac after fixing Windows and UNIX machines all day long. I'm so happy Apple went UNIX, nothing better on the planet...
 
Last edited:
Apples and oranges.

There are plenty of Apps on the PC that do just as good a job at what FCPro does on the Mac.

How do I know?

Because I own an Avid as well as a FCPro editing system.

Although the Avid is getting used less and less the more I shoot with my HVX, because the FCPro P2/MXF integration is REALLY solid, and all of the studio apps work WELL together.
 
BenB has a good point. I would suggest waiting until after MWSF before making a buying decision.

Horses for courses - I'm a big FCP fan, but Stu Maschwitz, whom I trust/respect/admire greatly, is a HUGE fan of the PPro/AE workflow.

Depends on what you need.
 
Hi:

I agree with McGee. While PPro and AVID on the PC are strong, they cannot compete with the integration that you will find in FCP Studio. The way that all of the apps interact together is superior even to the Adobe Suite IMHO. Simpler, easier and quicker. Sure Motion is no replacement for AE but for the average video editor on a deadline, Motion is MUCh easier to grasp and much easier to use for many "typical" graphic chores.

Is Soundtrack Pro better than Pro Tools? No, but it's free with FCP, much better integrated with the workflow and a heck of lot easier for the average video editor to use. I have had DVD Studio Pro since V 1.0 but I actually use iDVD a LOT more because it is so much easier and quicker. I hate complex DVDs anyway, simpler and quicker for DVD interfaces is almost always better IMHO, at least with the movie studios as clients.

I work at an AVID production company, we have 10 DV Xpress systems on Macs and PCs plus a Symphony Nitris on-line room. I just sit over here with my Kona 3 FCP system, happily getting work finished (we use my system for laying off all HVX-P2 media to DVCProHD tape as our archival backup). My little $10,000.00 FCP system does a LOT of things that the $100,000.00 Symphony Nitris sitting in the on-line room doesn't, things like 4:4:4 and RT 2K and easy and effective real time HD upconversion. The stupid DnxHD codec that the Nitris uses is stupid, all of the re-rendering and changing of codecs is a waste of time IMHO.

I also agree that getting an Intel Mac is a stroke of genius for flexibility. Macs are better PCs than PCs are although it must be weird to get a PC virus on your Mac but whatever.

I have been on FCP since V1.0 and since V4.03, FCP has been truly a professional tool with some limitations but for the money, one of the best pieces of software ever written. You will love it if you switch. It's not that PPro is bad, it's not but it's not as well integrated with a total post production workflow IMHO although Adobe has been trying. AE obviously rules all as far as motion graphics but it is difficult to become good at and it very time consuming to learn.

My .02

Dan
 
We can also pit AE against Shake, for the money. Shake integrates with FCP just like all the other apps. And no, Shake is NOT very difficult to learn. Which remind me, if you're way geeky like me, check out Conduit for FCP and Motion.

As for SoundTrack Pro, since it's gone Pro, it's a very powerful audio editing app, very overlooked.

Then there's FX Factory, which let's you make your own plug-ins. Especially cool since FCP 5.1.2 now recognizes the FX Plug format plug-ins that Motion uses.

BUT, I'm a firm believer in using what you feel most comfortable using, regardless of platform or brand.
 
For the MacPro, do you guys see the benefit of getting the 512mb ATI graphics card for additional $249 vs the stock Nvidia 256mb graphics card ?

I heard the quad core Mac pro and a 12" mac book pro are going to show up this jan at MWSF. Also heard of new Apple monitor designs as well.
 
We hear a lot of things, but Apple never officially says anything until the unveiling.

Upgrading to the best graphics card you can afford is always a good idea for video work.
 
BenB said:
[...] First of all, with the new Intel Macs, load up BootCamp and you have both worlds running great on one machine. There's no reason to chose one or the other. Get both, on a Mac! [...]
Click to expand...
By the way, I think Parallels Desktop for Mac is a better way to run Windows (or Linux or FreeBSD for that matter) and Mac OS X at the same time.

Parallels seamlessly runs in parallel (clever name they chose) with Mac OS X and takes advantage of the hardware-support for virtualization technology built into the Intel Core Duo processors (it does not support G4 and G5 based Macs). I currently need to run several utilities that are Windows only, so thus I run Parallels on my Mac Book Pro and it's quite a delightful experience (not Windows in and of itself, but the ability to have two machines in one). With the latest version of Parallels you'll find that there's very little performance hit as long as you're running on a machine with 2G of memory and allocate 512M to Parallels. Of course, you're still sharing the processor resources, so there is some hit, but it's not like the old days of running the dog-slow Virtual PC.
 
Which utilities are you running and for what purpose?

Appreciate some more info.

Also VMWare has its beta out as well, and they've been doing virtualization a lot longer. They also have additional hardware support.
 
FWIW, if you're a big user of After Effects and wish to stay with the software staying with Premiere is probably your best bet due to it's fantastic integration. It's so very nice being able to move between PP and AE without having to render. That said, if you want to move to shake and motion, Apple is the only way.
 
David S. said:
Which utilities are you running and for what purpose? [...]
Click to expand...
Here are some of the things I run under Windows which I can't (currently) run under Mac OS but I can under Windows w/ Parallels:
  • FLV MetaData Injector
  • Media Cleaner XL
  • Sony's NSP-100 control application (don't ask)
  • Testing PowerPoint with Windows Media embedded
  • Browser testing with IE on Windows
  • etc.
As a video producer who also does some web work, I have to be dual-platform (not by personal choice, but it's the reality that a large percentage of the world out there runs Windows, yet for my own editing and every day computer work, I find Mac OS more reliable, aesthetically pleasing, and requires less technical support activities.
 
BenB said:
Have you actually editing DVCPRO-HD footage in an NLE in Paralles? If so, how was the performance?
Click to expand...
I've only edited the DVCPRO HD footage with FCP on the Mac OS X side. I'd be curious to know how well Premiere handles something intensive like video editing running under Parallels. I wonder, given enough memory, it might not be so bad? For editing, Parallels seems perverse, but as machines get faster and faster...
 
One other thing to remember is that Adobe just purchased Serious Magic, so I would expect the next update of Premiere to have native support for DVCPro50/DVCProHD and MXF, so staying with the platform and tools you are currently on probably makes sense.
 
David Jimerson said:
Edius Broadcast runs wide circles around everything else for HVX/P2 integration.
Click to expand...


That's what I heard, then I hear that FCP is the best thing since sliced bread. I guess if the new Macs had the slots to handle the P2 cards, it would make sense so go mac.

However, since it doesn't, I guess my question is, does Edius come close to FCP ?(since it handles the P2 integration the best).
 
If you've invested time in learning an editor, and you like it, you probably should stick to it. Eventually all the major editors (Avid, Edius, Premiere, FCP, even Vegas) will have better support for new formats. Stick with what you like if it works for you.

On the other hand, if you're new to editing and in the process of choosing what NLE to invest time in getting to know, you have to weigh each according to what aspects are important to you, like
  • platform supported (Mac, Windows)
  • key features (editing, color correction, media management, integration with type, graphics, and effects programs, etc)
  • installed base
  • what people you work with are using
  • what clients demand (if you're working as a freelancer)
  • what appeals to you on a personal, aesthetic level
  • what works within your budget.
I'm not going to say one NLE is better than another, there are plenty of threads on that topic. Among indepedent filmmakers and small production houses, FCP has a solid footing, having been around since the days of those charming blue G3 towers, but Edius, Avid, Premiere, and Vegas all have solid, loyal user-bases. Each NLE has a unique combination of features, price, and performance, yet in the end, clients and audiences don't give a *&^% what something was edited with.
 
spunknoid said:
That's what I heard, then I hear that FCP is the best thing since sliced bread. I guess if the new Macs had the slots to handle the P2 cards, it would make sense so go mac.

However, since it doesn't, I guess my question is, does Edius come close to FCP ?(since it handles the P2 integration the best).
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, I don't yet know Edius well enough to say outside of its P2 integration. Seems pretty typical, though.

FCP and Premiere are extremely similar programs. If you have experience with Premiere, you pretty much know what to expect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top