d300s video on vimeo

again Jim the guy has a Youtube video D300s vs D300. But he has no D300s in the YouTube video. So all the video that say it is D300s video is taken with what?

The D300s has not been released yet so he doesn't have one to test and make video either.
 
The person that does a d300 vs d300s video is a totally different person. I don't know why you keep saying it the same person??
 
My mistake,,,but I'm still waiting for Nikon to release it. To many sources out there that you don't know about.
 
Matthew Bennett said:
Man these guys can't get Sony to make them a decent sensor to save their lives!
Click to expand...

Come off it man. I´m as disapointed as the next guy in Nikon´s video implementation, but IMO they produce the best SLRs on the planet.

The D3x currently holds the best 35mm sensor on the market, so don´t say they can´t get Sony to make them decent chips. http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Nikon/D3X

Also I think a lot of you underestimate the importance of the image processor vs the sensor. More processing power can mean significantly less jello, noise and compression artifacts.
 
well, jello is a function of the speed of the electronic shutter, and i'm fairly sure that's mostly limited by the sensor. sure, if the processor can't read it faster that becomes the bottleneck but i can't imagine the problem being that simple since even the most expensive sensors and cameras have jello to some extent. less noise and compression artifacts though, i agree. in nikon's case the debayer seems to be the biggest problem with the video, the lack of really sharp detail despite a downsampled image is proof enough, and it's clearly visible in the live view before the supposedly lousy compression takes place.
 
mattsand said:
well, jello is a function of the speed of the electronic shutter, and i'm fairly sure that's mostly limited by the sensor. sure, if the processor can't read it faster that becomes the bottleneck
Click to expand...

That's the what I'm talking about, the bottleneck. I wrote "can [...] reduce jello", not remove jello.
 
I know, but do you honestly think the processor is the bottleneck? I'm pretty sure it's the sensor that's slow, and if so that's the bottleneck and even making the processor ten times as fast isn't going to help the slightest.
 
I wonder how this manual aperture function will work in regards to automatic shutter speed and gain, etc?
 
mattsand said:
I know, but do you honestly think the processor is the bottleneck? I'm pretty sure it's the sensor that's slow, and if so that's the bottleneck and even making the processor ten times as fast isn't going to help the slightest.
Click to expand...

I agree because

Microprocessors are really sheep today, Big CMOS and CCD are not. So I think it it’s a really simple matter. And from what everything I’ve have seen I think it look very much like the D90 with its poor resolution and "fogy" image, but with lees jello.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top