Cinematography laws by Macgregor

macgregor

Veteran
I had some free time yesterday so i though it could be funny to summarize some mistakes people tend to do. This is a positive feedback. So we can all learn and do better. I myself have done some of this horrible things sometime.



1.- Never shoot with a shutter speed of 1/24, 1/25, or any combination of fps/360º shutter angle. You deserve to die in a fire for using 360º. Michael Mann deserves death (unless someone can proof he went blind in 2001).

2.- Magic Bullet Looks has some good and very interesting filters. But that probably is not going to turn your miniDV footage look Hollywood film. I´ve never seen any feature films that resemble the Magic bullet mojo. Godfather, Pulp Fiction, Schindler's List, Star Wars, Batman begins or Fight Club don´t look like any magic bullet preset.
Also, heavy color correction is going to ruin your film even more in 99% of cases. Stay natural. Natural is timeless.

3.- Highlights. Blown out highlights don't look like film. In fact, they don't look good at all. It's the number one difference between amateurs and pros. I've never seen anything good with overexposed highlights. If you think clipped shirts look ok to you, just keep walking to the end of the corridor, where it says Room101.

4.- Crushed blacks. This is the opposite. For the last 2-3 years, people tend to crush the shadows. So much that everything looks digital (in the cheap way). I've even seen some music videos shot on film that look like video because they crushed the blacks too much. Dark doesn't mean crushing your blacks. It's usually a wrong choice in gamma + a colorist has Parkinson's, bad taste, or a combination of both.

5.- Wrong gamma. Yep, most modern HDV cameras and HDslrs have default gammas that boost midtones as well as low highlights. This produces clean faces and bright images. Film doesn't look like this. In fact, reality doesn't look like this neither. Almost always, the number one reason why your footage looks like plastic or digital is because you need to lower your highlights with a curve.

6.- Cleanliness. Digital is too clean. Film is "dirty". Even the cleanest film scanned at 2K/HD resolution looks really bad. Grain everywhere. The truth is that we like this. If the image is too clean, it looks stationary and artificial. Add a bit of grain to your footage for a more natural and pleasant viewer experience (MB is good for this). BTW, noise is not grain.

7.- DOF. In the beginning, God created 1/3" chips. Everything was sharp. Everything was in focus. Close ups were boring because the background was too distracting. Today, it´s the opposite. With 35mm adapters, RED1 and HDdslrs everyone shoots wide open. Take it easy, blurriness hides your movie. I sometimes like to see sharp edges and a frame in focus. Keep in mind that most Hollywood movies are shot between T4 and T5.6 in normal light conditions. That is a good compromise between separating the elements of the scene and keeping an interesting composition. A close up of a girl with her nose out of focus because you are shooting with a 100mm at T1.3 is not pretty. Remember the rule: It might look sharp in your 3" screen. Believe me, it´ll be out of focus in the theater. So do not abuse of DOF.




Bonus rule: Sound is usually the difference between good and bad movies.
Of course, as any decalogue, you´re not supposed to follow it.
 
Last edited:
Nice list! But I'll open the debate with rulebreaker No1: 1/30 shutter on the HMC150! Gives nice progressive footage in non-PH modes! Worth it in many cases!
 
Great points for sure! I agree with all of them... although I'd hate to see some of those classic Wong Kar-wai films if the shutter wasn't completely open. I love the blurred smears in those Chungking Express running scenes. Therefore I think shutter speeds or angles past 1/48 or 180* have a beautiful place in cinema. It's just horrible when it's only being used to get more exposure... and we've all been there at one point or another.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euwk0ZSTCDA

^^^ AMAZING
 
Last edited:
Great points for sure! I agree with all of them... although I'd hate to see some of those classic Wong Kar-wai films if the shutter wasn't completely open. I love the blurred smears in those Chungking Express running scenes. Therefore I think shutter speeds or angles past 1/48 or 180* have a beautiful place in cinema. It's just horrible when it's only being used to get more exposure... and we've all been there at one point or another.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euwk0ZSTCDA

^^^ AMAZING

You are mixing things.
That clip you posted has a 180º shutter angle. The blurriness comes from shooting less frames per second and playing it back at the same fps (ie: 12fps).



In most film cameras it´s phisically impossible to open the shutter speed any wider than 180º, because the film has to move to the next frame while the remaining 180º of the shutter are rotating.
 
You are mixing things.
That clip you posted has a 180º shutter angle. The blurriness comes from shooting less frames per second and playing it back at the same fps (ie: 12fps).



In most film cameras it´s phisically impossible to open the shutter speed any wider than 180º, because the film has to move to the next frame while the remaining 180º of the shutter are rotating.

I understand the last part, but how does the blur get into the image? Shooting 12 fps @ 180* shutter should yield the same motion blur of 24fps @ 180* shutter, right?

I don't follow how the motion blur occurs.

EDIT: read my last post.
 
Last edited:
12fps at 180º = 1/24th
24fps at 180º = 1/48th
6fps at 180º = 1/12th
and so on

OK yes... you're completely right. How did I miss that? It might be clear by now that I've started the thanksgiving holiday festivities early. I think i'll stop posting until this jack and vanilla coke clears the system. :)

But it is a method to get what would be a lower shutter look on video, yes? It's just choppy because of the need to shoot at a lower fps to bypass the otherwise physical limitations of a rotating shutter and film movement, no?

Going back to before, good points MacGregor! Definitely some words of truth there.

Happy Turkey Day guys!
 
Last edited:
just get rid of the vanilla coke and keep the jack... I think it's the fru-fru vanilla coke that is messing with your brain waves :)

later,
Jason
 
Rule #1 Pay attention to advice from people whose work you admire, ignore everone else excepting:
Rule #2 Pay attention to suggestions from anyone who is paying you
 
I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed that. Guess this is the youtube age where blown highlights is ok.... maybe even "art."
I've noticed it also. But honestly....it's probably the only programming I see that I think it works. My mind kept telling me "video."

1.- Never shoot with a shutter speed of 1/24, 1/25, or any combination of fps/360º shutter angle. You deserve to die in a fire for using 360º. Michael Mann deserves death (unless someone can proof he went blind in 2001).
I've always liked Michael Mann flicks....but was always bothered by him dropping that shutter to 1/24 during night scenes (which he has plenty of in his films). Those smears always screamed video to me.
 
OK yes... you're completely right. How did I miss that? It might be clear by now that I've started the thanksgiving holiday festivities early. I think i'll stop posting until this jack and vanilla coke clears the system. :)

But it is a method to get what would be a lower shutter look on video, yes? It's just choppy because of the need to shoot at a lower fps to bypass the otherwise physical limitations of a rotating shutter and film movement, no?

Going back to before, good points MacGregor! Definitely some words of truth there.

Happy Turkey Day guys!

Damn, and I just found out how to change shutter speeds on my DVX... Ok... somethings take me a while...

As for blooming highlights... There's room for only one Kaminski per generation... ok, maybe two...

On the 'crushed blacks'... I was under the impression that some people were doing that to 'hide' the fact that there's quite a bit of noise in the 'darker' areas of the shot, given some types of lighing and certain... eh hem... less than $100k digital cameras...
 
Keep in mind that most Hollywood movies are shot between T4 and T5.6 in normal light conditions.

thanks for the list, a very helpful read.

Just wondering where the T4-5.6 numbers are from? Several of the recent films I've been reading in American Cinematographer are in the T2 - T2.8 (Star Trek - T2.875, Terminator Salvation - T2, Julie & Julia - T2.8).
 
I'm just getting into video and I was introduced to Magic Bullet looks.

It seems kinda fun and novelty but some of the basic stuff seems to be nice and quick for easy color correction?

Maybe I'm wrong but what do you suggest for a total newbie?

My raw footage looks great but let's say I use the MBL preset "Basic" seems to give things just enough of a nice look.

I dunno. Doesn't seem like a bad option to me. But like I said, just learning this stuff.
 
Back
Top