C300: Canon firmwire update for C300 mk II, C100 mk II and then some

I'm excited!

Magnify while recording is sorely missed! And focus assist for the CN-e's will be nice. I wonder what the benefits of Canon Log 3 are.
 
Such a disappointment:
http://www.newsshooter.com/2016/04/...-magnification-while-recording-to-c300-mk-ii/
We want codecs for C100 mk II and 4K 60P for C300 mk II, g#& da%n it.

I still think that 4K 60p is coming for the c300 Mark ii... I could be wrong, but I honestly feel they will release new firmware to unlock 4K 60p.. I hope so.... The 1dx Mark ii does it, so the c300 mark ii should have it as well... I think they are waiting for the right moment to announce it, but please, make it soon... :)
 
Last edited:
Is "Jim Martin" trolling?....this guy seems to be posting a lot and most is blind Sony/Blackmagic/Panasonic kind of fanboi stuff...


Believe or not, but people were hoping lot more for C100mkII. Starting with better codecs, as there will not be 4k.
And 4K 60P for C300mkII is just mandatory. Slow motion has become integral part of modern visual story telling. Commercials, wedding stuff, music videos...even documentaries. All where this camera is aiming at.
Hate this stalling. They could do it now.


And yes, all my cameras come from Canon, for now.
 
Jim Martin is a valued member of this community. He represents a dealer so he will talk about good things of all the products and not just biased about one.

A lot of us use an alias as user id here. Having a link in the signature about ourselves will let other people know about our identity. Else it is difficult to know a new member's bonafides.
 
Slow motion has become integral part of modern visual story telling. Commercials, wedding stuff, music videos...even documentaries.
Or more like the bane of "modern storytelling." I've seen some talented videographers producer well lit, well shot, well told...slow motion, that is as boring as heck because it's all in slow motion. "Let's just shoot all the b-roll in slow motion because it looks cool and the client [who doesn't know any better] loves it." I've heard that said one too many times before. It's a matter of, now that low and mid range productions can afford good looking slow motion, they think they have to use it, so it gets way overused. Same thing with drone shots, shallow depth of field, timelapses, and various other fads that have come and gone over the years. I'm glad to see the timelapse fad (gimmick) fading away over the last year or two, as well as the shallow depth of field fad, and as time goes on the slow motion fad and the drone fad will become less popular as time progresses as well.

Meanwhile, the high end market which knows better that has for a long time had access to all these tools is doing what the high end market always does, use them sparingly and only in the right circumstances.

Back when the FS700 came out, it was mainly used as a slow-motion camera, so anyone who had it as their A-camera was often shooting the majority of their footage in slow motion. So if someone had an FS700, you could guess their work might be sub-par work because of the excess of slow motion they'd use. After-all, they just spent $8k because they valued slow motion capabilities over image quality.

It's like giving a gun to a baby. A gun is a useful tool in many situations, but don't give a baby a gun, and don't give low end to mid range videographers slow motion if they don't know when to use it, as they might shoot themself in the face.

Of course I'm not saying it's not a useful tool to have when you actually do need it.
 
4K60p doesn't necessarily mean slo-motion or high frame rate.

It's actually a valid display frame rate, YouTube accepts 4K60p videos, and it will most likely be the 4K broadcast standard (not that it will happen anytime soon).

As several people on these forums have pointed out, they are being asked to record 4K60p already.
 
Horse for courses, I guess. I have yet to be asked for 4K 60p. Well, I guess on one shoot they would have liked it since the shoot was all 4K except for a couple slow motion shots we did.
 
Is "Jim Martin" trolling?....this guy seems to be posting a lot and most is blind Sony/Blackmagic/Panasonic kind of fanboi stuff...


Kinda funny....if anything, I've been called a Canon fan.....

Jim Martin
EVSonline.com
 
Is "Jim Martin" trolling?....this guy seems to be posting a lot and most is blind Sony/Blackmagic/Panasonic kind of fanboi stuff...


Believe or not, but people were hoping lot more for C100mkII. Starting with better codecs, as there will not be 4k.
And 4K 60P for C300mkII is just mandatory. Slow motion has become integral part of modern visual story telling. Commercials, wedding stuff, music videos...even documentaries. All where this camera is aiming at.
Hate this stalling. They could do it now.


And yes, all my cameras come from Canon, for now.


This made me laugh. Your obviously new. So....welcome! But....Jim is about the exact opposite of trolling. If you looked up any video from NAB...you might find out who you are talking about. I have only ever seen Jim post informative posts that have solid perspective.
 
4K60p doesn't necessarily mean slo-motion or high frame rate.

It's actually a valid display frame rate, YouTube accepts 4K60p videos, and it will most likely be the 4K broadcast standard (not that it will happen anytime soon).

As several people on these forums have pointed out, they are being asked to record 4K60p already.
Exactly! It is considered as a standard frame rate. When slowed down it's actually a strange beast: you wonder for a minute if it's a slow mo or just a slow action.
 
Or more like the bane of "modern storytelling." I've seen some talented videographers producer well lit, well shot, well told...slow motion, that is as boring as heck because it's all in slow motion. "Let's just shoot all the b-roll in slow motion because it looks cool and the client [who doesn't know any better] loves it." I've heard that said one too many times before. It's a matter of, now that low and mid range productions can afford good looking slow motion, they think they have to use it, so it gets way overused. Same thing with drone shots, shallow depth of field, timelapses, and various other fads that have come and gone over the years. I'm glad to see the timelapse fad (gimmick) fading away over the last year or two, as well as the shallow depth of field fad, and as time goes on the slow motion fad and the drone fad will become less popular as time progresses as well.

Meanwhile, the high end market which knows better that has for a long time had access to all these tools is doing what the high end market always does, use them sparingly and only in the right circumstances.

Back when the FS700 came out, it was mainly used as a slow-motion camera, so anyone who had it as their A-camera was often shooting the majority of their footage in slow motion. So if someone had an FS700, you could guess their work might be sub-par work because of the excess of slow motion they'd use. After-all, they just spent $8k because they valued slow motion capabilities over image quality.

It's like giving a gun to a baby. A gun is a useful tool in many situations, but don't give a baby a gun, and don't give low end to mid range videographers slow motion if they don't know when to use it, as they might shoot themself in the face.

Of course I'm not saying it's not a useful tool to have when you actually do need it.

LOL this reeks of pretension. You're really gonna make the analogy of slow motion being like a child with a gun?

All these techniques can be very helpful when used properly. Making the client feel like they are getting a high-end product is part of the job.

Who are these mythical people in the "high end markets" averse to new techniques & technology... they are blowing smoke!
 
Back
Top