Jean Dantes
Well-known member
ROFL WOW
iPhone man... seriously. *THING not THONG.
Haha! I guess the irony is that you were in a lingerie store as you accidently misspelt that! :grin:
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ROFL WOW
iPhone man... seriously. *THING not THONG.
I think that Kholi's inadvertently caused more confusion than he intended to clear. We were doing OK working with crop factors...
The problem is that the OP does not know what any given focal length looks like on any camera. Whether or not there's a "crop factor" is irrelevant. The OP does not have any frame of reference, not full-frame and not S35.
The other problem is that people use lenses differently and have different tastes, which limits the usefulness of any advice. In the FF still photo world, some people consider 24mm too wide and prefer 28mm, some consider 24mm wide enough, and some like to shoot even wider than 24mm. In the end, someone who's trying to decide on a wide prime lens still has to try lenses for him- or herself before he/she can really know what's best for him/her.
I think we should go to the 5D2 forums and start complaining that an 85mm lens became a ~50mm lens when on the 5D2.
Seriously though, for anyone reading this, if you have no intimate knowledge of FF field of views already, instead of fudging around with crop factors and equiv. FOVs, just take 5 minutes to remember this:
On APS-C cameras:
< 17mm = very wide
17-28 = wide
35 = "normal"
50 = medium telephoto
85 and > = telephoto
That's it! Just forget the FF equivalents!
-X
But I guess that's like 11mm in Full Frame.
Ahem... it's more like ~28mm really.
-X
From where I come from (defined as working environment) this crop factor stuff is nonsense and useless. But, if it works-- in an obviously counter productive fashion-- to constantly try to measure up to an image that you wouldn't even get ANYWAY because you're not using a Full Frame image... I guess that's fine?
Comparisons between the 7D and the 5D are on the decline here, as far as I can see. They certainly don't dominate the threads here. And usually when the 5D is mentioned for comparison, it's only about differences in image quality or other functionality (like frame rates and audio), which have little do with crop factor.With two cameras out there with different sensor characteristics - that are CURRENTLY being compared to each other - is it not important to understand the difference?
The issue is that the difference only needs to be acknowledged when comparisons with other formats like FF appear in discussions. We are starting to see that the overwhelming amount of discussion in this forum is about the 7D only, which means that raising the matter of crop factor is typically unnecessary and often confusing for the many readers here who don't have FF photography as their accustomed frame of reference.Like you, I prefer the 7D's FOV for production work. I have little interest in the 5D, but why is there issue when acknowledging the difference?
Go to a camera store and put a zoom on a DX nikon (roughly same size sensor), look thru the viewfinder and move the zoom to 24, 28, 35, 50
voila! Then u will know
Or...well...you know.... Canon cameras at the store should work nicely too. *Exactly* the same sensor size.