Matthew Bennett
Well-known member
First off, I'm very impressed by the images on the red.com site, looking forward to seeing more.
On to my topic- maybe it's just me, but the camera images have the look of renders from 3D Studio Pro, the way the out of focus areas look and of course the noisless-ness of the image. I'm not a 3D artist, but I've seen a lot of work that an old roommate of mine did in the before-mentioned program.
I've always hated this look when seeing 3D animations, but now that I'm seeing that same look from a live source, it's very intriguing.
I'm not saying in any way that i think the images on red.com are cgi renders.. I'm just saying that to my eye, they share a lot of qualities with hi-res cg work. It's like you get all the cleanliness and 'slickness of a digital look, but the source is life, which could never be replicated by a 3d program. It's a 'best of both worlds' situation...
Very interesting look, I hope that it holds through the process of tweaking the sensor or whatever the final process is.
On to my topic- maybe it's just me, but the camera images have the look of renders from 3D Studio Pro, the way the out of focus areas look and of course the noisless-ness of the image. I'm not a 3D artist, but I've seen a lot of work that an old roommate of mine did in the before-mentioned program.
I've always hated this look when seeing 3D animations, but now that I'm seeing that same look from a live source, it's very intriguing.
I'm not saying in any way that i think the images on red.com are cgi renders.. I'm just saying that to my eye, they share a lot of qualities with hi-res cg work. It's like you get all the cleanliness and 'slickness of a digital look, but the source is life, which could never be replicated by a 3d program. It's a 'best of both worlds' situation...
Very interesting look, I hope that it holds through the process of tweaking the sensor or whatever the final process is.