RieniO
Well-known member
I know nothing about lenses so maybe this question is just dumb. But I'm considering investing in one or two Zeiss primes. On the Zeiss site, a few "still primes" are presented as suitable for using for filming. These still primes have Nikon or Canon mounts. Then they also have the famous compact prime lenses with PL mount. Now whether I buy Nikon mount of PL mount lensens, I'll have to use an "to mft adapter" anyway. Not taking the price difference between the different lenses and costs for adapter into consideration, is there an advantage in going the PL mount way or going the Nikon mount way? For me personally one advantage of buying a Nikon mount Zeiss prime is that I can use it on my Nikon still cameras. But what about electronic control/feedback? I assume that both PL and Nikon mount lenses don't provide electronic control of focus and aperture when mounted on a GH2?