XHA1 worth investing in?

Ki-Ki

Veteran
Will it be at the bottom of the pile in 3 years time?
Is there a serious competitor worth considering instead?
Or in this age and day is it just worth investing in a couple of HV40's?

What do you think?
:beer:
 
Will technology continue to advance? Of course it will. Today's hot new technology is tomorrow's boat anchor!

What you should be asking yourself, does what your purchasing make sense to you with what you are doing right now? Only you can answer that question. As a business, we buy things which have to be able to have a solid ROI. ie. We picked up a Red One system when they first came out and it paid for itself in less than two months.
 
I love the lens of the xha1 20x, miss it, own an HMC 150 now & love the tapeless workflow but the lens is too short sometimes. I m shooting alot outdoors right now and it just comes up too short. Only 13x but it has a very nice wideangle lens. If theire was no hmc 150 I would not have sold my xha1. I'd look for an xha1 with low hours If I would have to purchase one again.
HV 40 's ? sounds like a Hybrid Hummer model :)
 
I have the HPX170 and LOVE IT! BUT, I truley miss the lens on the A1. Top notch imo. I just hated the 4:2:0 and HDV specs.
 
with that price range, I would say so. It looks pro and the footage is great. Products like this always have a second hand market. I remember selling my GL-2 2 years ago on eBay for $1300. I bought it at $1700.
 
Never have I had a camera that was a boat anchor. If I felt like it was getting obsolete, I used it as a disposable camera.
Now NLE's on the other hand... lol
 
My XHA1 is rented out all the time, so people are still using it professionally. The picture is incredibly sharp and it looks great projected.

What price are you hoping to buy for? I might be selling mine soon.
 
I still use an A1, and just last night was editing some footage that looked great. This camera is a few years old, but it can still produce jaw dropping footage. As mentioned above, the HMC150 is also a good choice, mainly whether or not you can live with the shorter focal length lens and want to or can deal with the tapeless AVC-HD workflow. It is really nice to be able to shoot HD, but to also have the option to shot either 16x9 or 4x3 SD to DV tape when a client calls for it. That is something you can't do with the Panasonic camera because they didn't include a tape drive.

If you can find a used A1 with low hours at a decent price then that might be the way to go. More money for other gear then if need be.

The HV20/30/40 series are nice little cameras for the price, but the manual controls and just above all much better picture quality sets the A1 apart. My HV20 is great for B-cam footage, and would never replace my A1 except on specific occasions like I had to get a shot from inside a mailbox or something.
 
I hope that is a typo, dude... that's over 15 grand over 3 years... My car payment is less than that...

Complete and utter highway robbery dude. 428 x 36 = 15408. Please tell me I am missing something.

Later,
jason
 
I hope that is a typo, dude... that's over 15 grand over 3 years... My car payment is less than that...

Complete and utter highway robbery dude. 428 x 36 = 15408. Please tell me I am missing something.

Later,
jason

You could buy it, use it, then resell it, and you'd end up far better than this joke.
 
There's nothing about the A1 that will make a talented person look bad. Same goes with DVX100, GL2, etc............
 
Works out 66 BRITISH pounds per month, thats..

$1,284 a year, for 3 years.

$3,852 for 3 years.

- ( According to xe.com )

Sorry for the typo. :thumbsup:
 
Works out 66 BRITISH pounds per month, thats..

$1,284 a year, for 3 years.

$3,852 for 3 years.

- ( According to xe.com )

Sorry for the typo. :thumbsup:

That makes more sense, as I too thought it was going to be 15,000 bucks.

Still though, unless you absolutely can only afford to lease, you might be better off searching for a mint used one, which will probably run in the $2,400 to $2,700 range. That way you're not tied into a lease two or three years from now if you outgrow the A1. I love shooting with my A1, but the fact is that Canon and everyone else will develop and release better stuff than the A1 within the next year. Worst case scenario, Canon will most likely release an XH-A2 that will be a substantial upgrade.

I'd say go with a used on because even in another year or two you will still be able to sell it for around $2,000 or a little less if it is in good or great condition.
 
Back
Top