Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are lots of wireless systems for microphones, but I don't know of any wireless systems that allow for line level input coming from a mixer. Anything that would do that - and be reliable - would be fairly pricey. It would probably be more cost effective - and safer since there isn't the potential for RF interference and drop-outs - to get a dedicated audio recorder and sync the audio in post.
There are lots of wireless systems for microphones, but I don't know of any wireless systems that allow for line level input coming from a mixer. Anything that would do that - and be reliable - would be fairly pricey. It would probably be more cost effective - and safer since there isn't the potential for RF interference and drop-outs - to get a dedicated audio recorder and sync the audio in post.
Thanks for the reply. I see what you're saying. The issue with syncing in post is quite labor intensive since I don't just let the camera role for the whole event.
It is mostly live event so it's quite hard to utilize slate and start/stop with the audio recorder plus the camera.Ideally, you'll start and stop both camera and audio recorder at the same time, and diligently slate each take (with written notes as well).
Go read specs on everything from Audio Technica's 1800 series to Sennheiser's G3 to Lectrosonics 400 series (and more). The transmitters can be switched for line-level input.
One thing to consider, though, is that you're adding another link to the signal chain in which compander artifacts can muss up the signal's quality. High-end systems like Lectro and Zaxcom tend to have less noticeable (if noticeable at all) companding.
As for the risk of going wireless, yes... use a hard line if at all possible ("whenever you're able, use a cable"). But a wireless camera hop is not unheard of and, depending on the needs of the show, is quite common. There's usually a recorder with a dedicated cable feed from the mixer running in tandem, since so much can go wrong on a wireless hop.
I see. Many thanks for the response. So, since that's considered "illegal" what's legal that are still as good or better that's out there?Yes, it's true. The FCC did some chicanery, and that frequency range is no longer "legal". I put that in quotes because there are people out there that have had block 28 systems for years, and are probably still using them. You'll find that different countries have different frequency ranges that are considered "legal", which can cause problems for sound people who do a lot of international travel. The reality is, you can technically still use those frequency ranges, as there isn't anything blocking you from doing so, other than other things broadcasting on those frequencies, then you would have interference, but I've never heard of a sound mixer getting busted for using a wireless system on "illegal" frequencies. It's just simply unenforceable.
Just came from a live event shoot. I was lucky this time to have a wired cable from the mixer's master out to my EX1. However, as I was looking at the Lectro 400 series, I found this statement somewhere.
"This is a block 28 (GY) Lectrosonic that is in the 700 range. This product is illegal to operate in the US."
Is this true? If so, then it's useless to buy this model?
Just came from a live event shoot. I was lucky this time to have a wired cable from the mixer's master out to my EX1. However, as I was looking at the Lectro 400 series, I found this statement somewhere.
"This is a block 28 (GY) Lectrosonic that is in the 700 range. This product is illegal to operate in the US."
Is this true? If so, then it's useless to buy this model?
Okay, so, how do I find out what's legal and what's not? Is there a website somewhere that shows all the illegal frequencies?
Okay, so if I follow this chart, I should have no problems, correct?