Well played with my new toy the T3i and wanted to share back my experience as a Nikon user for about 5 years.
Nikon is still struggling in making an aggressive dive into the videography market. I was one of the first buyers to get the D90 because of the 720p HD video (shortly after, Canon came out with the 7D), was it great not really. Now don't misunderstand me it was a great photo camera but not for video. Then came out the D3100 and I couldn't resist the improved video with 1080p. Great improvement but still handicapped. Later the D5100 came out and again I couldn't resist and bought one, but again it's still handicapped for videographers. Now when I was debating between the T3i and D5200, I was mainly concerned with video options. So the question is why did I decide to go with the T3i instead of the new censor of the D5200? Was it the price only (got the T3i with 18-135mm on sale for $699 plus tax at my local best buy store), no it was not. I would have gladly bought the D5200 with the 18-200mm if Nikon have not handicapped it again. Yes it has a slightly better sensor in low light, and yes it now has manual audio, but that's not enough. Also the DSLR camera I buy must have an articulated screen, that's why the full frame cameras at the time being are out of question for me.
So what is it about the T3i that I liked that Nikon does not have:
1. Complete manual control including aperture, with Nikon you have to stop recording to adjust aperture.
2. With Canon I can see my exposure changes in real time on the live view screen (just like a video camera). Not so with Nikon, after making your changes you must exist and re-enter live view each time to see picture quality/changes.
3. T3i has the light meter in live view, not so with Nikon, not even the new D5200.
4. The older T3i already had manual audio
5. No Histogram in Live view on D5200.
An added bonus for photography the T3i has a built in flash commander not so on the D5200, (this had nothing to do with my decision but wanted to share it.
By the way the above also applies to the new D7100 which I would have gladly bought if it did have the features I was looking for as a videographer. While Canon has to protect it's pro video lineup cameras, Nikon has no excuse. Nikon Simply if you are serious about us videographers you must not make us wait for years to get proportional new features. Can I take beautiful video with Nikon, Yes I can. However during some shoots I don't have the time to toy around with the camera to get proper exposure. I have already vested into three cameras and several lenses from Nikon, including stock lenses, 70-300mm, 50mm 1.8 and 35mm 1.8. I am going to sit on the T3i for now and wait before I make my biggest leap of investment with some serious lenses. I hope Nikon will listen instead of losing many of it's new base to Canon.
So Nikon why not fix the above and do a little more, you have nothing to loose and more to gain, unlike Canon with a pro Video camera line up. So how about Zerba and focus peaking as a starter. Would be nice to have that as a standard feature instead of using third party firmware such as magic lantern, oh did I mention magic lantern!!! It's all about picture quality and ease of use through proper tools. I like competition and haven't gave up on Nikon yet. Well that's my two cents for now.
Nikon is still struggling in making an aggressive dive into the videography market. I was one of the first buyers to get the D90 because of the 720p HD video (shortly after, Canon came out with the 7D), was it great not really. Now don't misunderstand me it was a great photo camera but not for video. Then came out the D3100 and I couldn't resist the improved video with 1080p. Great improvement but still handicapped. Later the D5100 came out and again I couldn't resist and bought one, but again it's still handicapped for videographers. Now when I was debating between the T3i and D5200, I was mainly concerned with video options. So the question is why did I decide to go with the T3i instead of the new censor of the D5200? Was it the price only (got the T3i with 18-135mm on sale for $699 plus tax at my local best buy store), no it was not. I would have gladly bought the D5200 with the 18-200mm if Nikon have not handicapped it again. Yes it has a slightly better sensor in low light, and yes it now has manual audio, but that's not enough. Also the DSLR camera I buy must have an articulated screen, that's why the full frame cameras at the time being are out of question for me.
So what is it about the T3i that I liked that Nikon does not have:
1. Complete manual control including aperture, with Nikon you have to stop recording to adjust aperture.
2. With Canon I can see my exposure changes in real time on the live view screen (just like a video camera). Not so with Nikon, after making your changes you must exist and re-enter live view each time to see picture quality/changes.
3. T3i has the light meter in live view, not so with Nikon, not even the new D5200.
4. The older T3i already had manual audio
5. No Histogram in Live view on D5200.
An added bonus for photography the T3i has a built in flash commander not so on the D5200, (this had nothing to do with my decision but wanted to share it.
By the way the above also applies to the new D7100 which I would have gladly bought if it did have the features I was looking for as a videographer. While Canon has to protect it's pro video lineup cameras, Nikon has no excuse. Nikon Simply if you are serious about us videographers you must not make us wait for years to get proportional new features. Can I take beautiful video with Nikon, Yes I can. However during some shoots I don't have the time to toy around with the camera to get proper exposure. I have already vested into three cameras and several lenses from Nikon, including stock lenses, 70-300mm, 50mm 1.8 and 35mm 1.8. I am going to sit on the T3i for now and wait before I make my biggest leap of investment with some serious lenses. I hope Nikon will listen instead of losing many of it's new base to Canon.
So Nikon why not fix the above and do a little more, you have nothing to loose and more to gain, unlike Canon with a pro Video camera line up. So how about Zerba and focus peaking as a starter. Would be nice to have that as a standard feature instead of using third party firmware such as magic lantern, oh did I mention magic lantern!!! It's all about picture quality and ease of use through proper tools. I like competition and haven't gave up on Nikon yet. Well that's my two cents for now.