what could af100 do that gh2 couldn't?

I don't have access to a GH2 anymore, but I've not seen anything in what I have read that indicate the rolling shutter or the aliasing is any better. The rolling shutter on the GH2 was just a little faster then half as slow as the AF100. The aliasing issue is relative to the sensor, not the encoding technique.

Now image wise, other than the two things I listed above, I thought the GH2 looked really good, but for me, those two things I mentioned were what really made the AF100 an easier winner as the A camera from even throwing out all the 50+ other features on the AF100.
 
Back
Top