Carlos_E._Martinez
Well-known member
Re: What about ag dvx100AE (PAL)?
[quote author=Barry_Green link=board=nws;num=1070436114;start=0#15 date=12/18/03 at 12:04:39]
PAL makes great sense for PAL countries, but in NTSC-land it's basically a silly choice.[/quote]
PAL still makes a good choice if you want to shoot video for film blow-up. Even if you live in an NTSC country.
And apparently even shooting 25P with a PAL DVX100 brings further improvements over plain 50i.
The principal reason for this is economical, as an NTSC to film transfer will cost about 30% or more than PAL to film. The 20% extra lines are a bonus too.
What I do not know yet is if there are labs doing transfer from 24p stuff shot on DVX100 for the same prices than PAL labs.
If blowing-up 24p prices are the same as a standard NTSC blow-up, then going to 24p (for film projects) is still senseless.
Adjusting the 4% pitch, correcting PAL's 25 frames running slower at 24 frames, is easy and almost unnoticed on modern audio editing.
Carlos
[quote author=Barry_Green link=board=nws;num=1070436114;start=0#15 date=12/18/03 at 12:04:39]
PAL makes great sense for PAL countries, but in NTSC-land it's basically a silly choice.[/quote]
PAL still makes a good choice if you want to shoot video for film blow-up. Even if you live in an NTSC country.
And apparently even shooting 25P with a PAL DVX100 brings further improvements over plain 50i.
The principal reason for this is economical, as an NTSC to film transfer will cost about 30% or more than PAL to film. The 20% extra lines are a bonus too.
What I do not know yet is if there are labs doing transfer from 24p stuff shot on DVX100 for the same prices than PAL labs.
If blowing-up 24p prices are the same as a standard NTSC blow-up, then going to 24p (for film projects) is still senseless.
Adjusting the 4% pitch, correcting PAL's 25 frames running slower at 24 frames, is easy and almost unnoticed on modern audio editing.
Carlos