cinemakinoeye
Well-known member
Today the technology exists for every device, cameras, zoom controllers, continuity supervisor's notebook, etc. to operate on a network. Why not do two things:
FIRST have a Gigabit Ethernet metadata/control/data port (and an optional a Fibre Data Port for high-end formats) so the camera can operate on a LAN as a full participant, and use web services for inter-operation of devices, the camera can be easily controlled via a browser interface or web services APIs.
SECOND, take a leadership role in defining a standard set of camera/image acquisition APIs that would allow cameras to interoperate in an IT environment with the same simplicity that computers communicate today. For studio work, a single network could be used for camera control and data transfer, simple Gigabit ethernet connections between all devices. This is the future, and Red can take a leadership role in the convergence of camera design and IT networks.
Every RED camera as a network device with it's own IP address and web-services API...
FIRST have a Gigabit Ethernet metadata/control/data port (and an optional a Fibre Data Port for high-end formats) so the camera can operate on a LAN as a full participant, and use web services for inter-operation of devices, the camera can be easily controlled via a browser interface or web services APIs.
SECOND, take a leadership role in defining a standard set of camera/image acquisition APIs that would allow cameras to interoperate in an IT environment with the same simplicity that computers communicate today. For studio work, a single network could be used for camera control and data transfer, simple Gigabit ethernet connections between all devices. This is the future, and Red can take a leadership role in the convergence of camera design and IT networks.
Every RED camera as a network device with it's own IP address and web-services API...