Voigtlander f0.95 25mm vs Angenieux t2.2 17.5-70mm super 16mm lens

why are people still zooming?? please stop, it looks amateur/lame/tv-newsy and you'll just be pissed off there aren't many dslr zoom lenses with a constant aperture. everything will improve if you change the way you shoot/edit to eliminate those oh so awkward and distracting long zooming shots! ;)

Nothing wrong with zooming when used right. I use it all the time when appropriate in doc-style work. In narrative, zooming is often intentionally used to affect a hand held/documentary verité style. And of course, who doesn't use zooms to spoof or emulate 70's exploitation flicks.
 
why are people still zooming?? please stop, it looks amateur/lame/tv-newsy and you'll just be pissed off there aren't many dslr zoom lenses with a constant aperture. everything will improve if you change the way you shoot/edit to eliminate those oh so awkward and distracting long zooming shots! ;)

Having been a news producer, director and editor in my career history I take issue with tv-newsy being equated with lame and amateurish. Some of the best camera and cutting tricks I've ever learned came from those lame tv-newsy people. And nearly everyone I've met in news was a hardworking professional. I've seen plenty of things in tv shows, movies and news that would make me cringe but I wouldn't equate those instances to an entire field. And as someone who now teaches shooting and editing I usually say to each their own. Zoom if it makes sense. It can be great or it can be crap.

But properly motivated and well thought out zooms are hugely effective when they work for the narrative or emotional content of any visual piece. From Hitchcock to 60 Minutes; the latter, by the way, pioneered the super slow zoom. Guess no one told them they were doing it wrong.
 
Back
Top