David_Tanner
Member
Im confused, Ive read every post in this thread and I really dont mean to bump it but...
This camera obviously performs really well in low light. Now if you have ever owned an HVX like myself you would be lying if you never had a low light vs low noise issue. Infact I found the Hvx to have a noise issue full stop.
I too notice the difference in this mkii stuff and 24fps stuff but...I really like how well this camera performs in low light and its in my price range. Does that make me an idiot for wanting to try this camera out?
So whats wrong with converting the 30fps to 24fps?
Sure its not ideal, but either was spending extra dosh and time and headaches on lighting setups and trying to eliminate noise by 'tricking' the HVX into creating a somewhat usable image.
Obviously recording 24fps off the bat is better but then so would be low noise!
What Im trying to say is that surely that extra hour or so in post converting 30 to 24 is, going to be less hastle as that extra hour in production 'trying' to get a low noise image and dont us indie filmakers usually have MORE time to crack in post then during a shoot?
Im not interested in 30fps, so can someone please tell me what difference something SHOT with 24fps and something CONVERTED down to 24fps looks like?:huh:
Does it have different motion blur?
What can I expect to be different?
Im thinking if I slow down the footage to 24fps its still gonna appear to clean between frames, not enough motion blur?
However If I cut frames out, like the oldschool way they would overcrank. Would I be loosing those blurry frames? I dont know.
What am I looking for here?
We are saying 30fps feels different from 24fps but also 24fps looks different from...24fps (post)?
This camera obviously performs really well in low light. Now if you have ever owned an HVX like myself you would be lying if you never had a low light vs low noise issue. Infact I found the Hvx to have a noise issue full stop.
I too notice the difference in this mkii stuff and 24fps stuff but...I really like how well this camera performs in low light and its in my price range. Does that make me an idiot for wanting to try this camera out?
So whats wrong with converting the 30fps to 24fps?
Sure its not ideal, but either was spending extra dosh and time and headaches on lighting setups and trying to eliminate noise by 'tricking' the HVX into creating a somewhat usable image.
Obviously recording 24fps off the bat is better but then so would be low noise!
What Im trying to say is that surely that extra hour or so in post converting 30 to 24 is, going to be less hastle as that extra hour in production 'trying' to get a low noise image and dont us indie filmakers usually have MORE time to crack in post then during a shoot?
Im not interested in 30fps, so can someone please tell me what difference something SHOT with 24fps and something CONVERTED down to 24fps looks like?:huh:
Does it have different motion blur?
What can I expect to be different?
Im thinking if I slow down the footage to 24fps its still gonna appear to clean between frames, not enough motion blur?
However If I cut frames out, like the oldschool way they would overcrank. Would I be loosing those blurry frames? I dont know.
What am I looking for here?
We are saying 30fps feels different from 24fps but also 24fps looks different from...24fps (post)?
