Well, you could get the Ninja, which is just $995 before tax, cards and accessories.I didn't want to start a debate about whether or not the AF100 should include 10-bit 4:2:2 recording. There's other threads for that. I'm not surprised the AF100 doesn't, and I think what I've seen from the AF100 so far looks amazing. The point of my post was that the Ki Pro Mini isn't really a $2000 solution. It's much more than that if you want to have it near the camera and portable for shooting with.
I made a short with the unhacked GH1 for BetrayalFest that got into a couple festivals. I saw it projected on a theater screen at the Laemmle Sunset 5 in West Hollywood in July. I was worried it wasn't going to hold up, especially with my not-so-great DP work on that film and excessive grading, but it actually held up and looked great. I was amazed. Jack Daniel Stanley's short also screened at that festival, was also shot with the GH1 (unhacked afaik), and I thought it looked amazing as well. The AF100 will only be better. I have no doubt the AF100 will allow films to be shot that will look amazing projected in a theater. So my thought for myself is to not get the Ki Pro Mini and use the native SD card recording in the AF100 until I know I need a Ki Pro Mini, which I suspect won't be ever be necessary for myself.
I can't wait to get my AF100....