joshreluctant
Well-known member
Re: trailer for my new film
OKOKOK MASTER CRITIQUE HERE..... ok. Just kidding. But I'd rather point out about the actual film, much less overexposure (which is clearly obvious). I don't actually agree with everyone else that shaky camerawork is so bad. I only saw about 40 seconds in, so maybe i missed all the crap footage with the shakiness. But to me, a natural shakiness can add a different feel to a movie. A natural shake with interspersed cuts of other peoples reactions and a good story can be just like an alejandro gonzalez inarittu film. (21 grams, amores perros). I don't think this falls in that category, so try to work on that a bit. Also, I hated the full screen, you're clearly not using your camera to it's fullest extent. you shot in 30 interlaced when the sole purpose of the DVX being so badass, is the 24p and 24pa modes. What was your thinking behind that? (I'm really actually wondering).
Josh
OKOKOK MASTER CRITIQUE HERE..... ok. Just kidding. But I'd rather point out about the actual film, much less overexposure (which is clearly obvious). I don't actually agree with everyone else that shaky camerawork is so bad. I only saw about 40 seconds in, so maybe i missed all the crap footage with the shakiness. But to me, a natural shakiness can add a different feel to a movie. A natural shake with interspersed cuts of other peoples reactions and a good story can be just like an alejandro gonzalez inarittu film. (21 grams, amores perros). I don't think this falls in that category, so try to work on that a bit. Also, I hated the full screen, you're clearly not using your camera to it's fullest extent. you shot in 30 interlaced when the sole purpose of the DVX being so badass, is the 24p and 24pa modes. What was your thinking behind that? (I'm really actually wondering).
Josh