Snapper123
Well-known member
But if something looks crystal clear, entirely in focus, and "real life" in the viewfinder, doesn't that mean there's something wrong with the way your camera processes the image if the picture then comes out blurry, out of focus, lacking detail, having unrealistic colors, ect ect? Because I've never encountered a lens in my life that doesn't look 'real life' in the viewfinder, yet snap a picture, and things look horrible. I'm not sure why that is.
P.S. There's no reason a picture should turn out unrealistic looking if you shoot at around 125th shutter, the settings as flat as you can get them, the aperture high enough to sharpen the picture (which not surprisingly, aperture doesn't effect the viewfinder's quality in the slightest.). I've entertained that my lenses my have "back focus" issues (?) but with how my photographs and videos usually turn out when you inspect the photo at 1:1, or even if it's severe enough to see the negative effect just with the normal view on the LCD, I at least know that something is wrong and it's not the "quality" of my glass.
P.S. There's no reason a picture should turn out unrealistic looking if you shoot at around 125th shutter, the settings as flat as you can get them, the aperture high enough to sharpen the picture (which not surprisingly, aperture doesn't effect the viewfinder's quality in the slightest.). I've entertained that my lenses my have "back focus" issues (?) but with how my photographs and videos usually turn out when you inspect the photo at 1:1, or even if it's severe enough to see the negative effect just with the normal view on the LCD, I at least know that something is wrong and it's not the "quality" of my glass.
Last edited: