Well, these truly are exciting and yet confusing times for many of us.
I’m not sure what class I belong to. I just wanted a better than average prosumer camera than I can record some of my experiences while still in the military. I’ve left too many moments in my life pass me by unrecorded.
“I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched sea beams glitter in the darkness at Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time like tears in rain. Time to die.”
- Blade Runner (I love that quote!)
I don't know who was acting too excited for ya John. I certainly wasn't jumping around while I typed my "call it as I see it" response. I'm suggesting calmly that your perception isn't a technical fact. I didn't suggest you get your eyes checked, which I would if I saw the XL2 footage as ghostly <g>.
In all seriousness, dont take things so literal. That was my way of saying "Yes I am aware of everything you posted" but was just making a casual observation and not stating any technical facts.
Right on for the line control in the xlrs. How cold I use my Shure mixer for my very ancient, but excellent Electrovoice shotgun? Audio is very much of any movie.
I'm in the class that says whats the camera worth if the picture is good but the audio is crap. No switchable line level in the xlr's? Noisy audio? Iffy iris control? Having to buy speciality lenses for specials situations? If the XL2 is gonna compete in the same league as the DVX then your going to have to buy a DAT recorder and velcro it onto your XL2. So far im unimpressed with the XL2 and it's not because im a DVX fanboy. Its because this is typical Canon b.s., and I expected as such when the XL2 came out. I had the money to buy either camera and I could'nt see wasting my money on a first generation camera with numerous bugs. I waited, and ended up buying a DVX . So now instead of crying and bitching about how canon doushed everbody, Im out there shooting, making some $$, and seeing the smiles on clients faces as they are super impressed with the picture of the DVX.
I waited for Canon to anounce the XL2... it didn't really do much for me, so I bought a DVX. I'm sure it's a great cam, but it didn't slap me in the face the way the DVX did.
Manual lens is about $1500, no IS and no manual iris control.
Yes there are ways to get line level to mic level but they all introduce noise. The whole point of line level is to get the superior signal generated by a good sound mixer and sound person. It makes a huge difference. And trying to post sync a DAT is an unnecesary pain in the assets.
Regarding previous posts. Birns had very carefully set the XL2 and the 100A to identical settings for my test. So please do not assume the camera wasn't calibrated correctly. Secondly a great majority of my clonclusions were made from the DVD that Canon it's self created. Now if Canon can't make it's own camera perform acceptably for thier sample DVD one has to wonder if the rest of us can. Put simply, Canon had a chance to knock one out of the park, they merely hit a double, they got 16:9 and good, clean low light response. The interchangeable lens is a mixed bag and the 24P is just playing catchup.
Also just to add, you can get manual lens control if you can find the older 14x lens. But you get a rotating front element to screw on polarisers etc don't do so well. Also I think you miss the ND filters too.