Talent versus 'mud, jello and banding'

In that 720 passworded video up there? I didn't see any "mud" that is the result of a whip pan or zoom that I see in 1080p.

make the video full screen and look again.

Then read below, he says that all these mud issues are displayed on his clip even though he shot it at 720p.

Check it out and see if you don't agree that just about everything that has been discussed as problematic is featured in this one clip.
 
Ah. Well maybe I'm confusing the terms mud and jello, cause this looks nothing like what I get on whip pans in 1080p
 
All I know is that even if the GH1 is the last camera that I will ever own, I'll be a happy camper shooting my movies with it...
 
I meant to say that a lot if not all of these problems can not be solved by shooting 720 - and should have added in scenes like these.

Unfortunately, I got the GH1 to primarily shoot in places like this. There are other spots in this clip where the mud is maybe even worse, but less noticeable because attention is drawn to the foreground - as in the part with close shots of goldenrod. As themartist indicated, this could be alleviated with a shallower DOF. I was just fooling around with the camera here.

Am I disappointed? Yes. But I'll find workarounds. And luckily, almost all my stuff is destined for the Web. So there are many cases where either movement or a viewer's focus on the area of primary interest would allow some mud to slip by unnoticed. That said, I sure wouldn't use this clip in a situation where it could be made full-screen.
 
I recall reading a post a while ago saying that the stock lens was actually creating more problems for the camera because it had too much information to process (autofocus, exposure), could this have any influence on the mud issue?
 
I recall reading a post a while ago saying that the stock lens was actually creating more problems for the camera because it had too much information to process (autofocus, exposure), could this have any influence on the mud issue?
That is something I look forward to testing and verifying. I don't know that anyone's done any conclusive testing of that yet.
 
I recall reading a post a while ago saying that the stock lens was actually creating more problems for the camera because it had too much information to process (autofocus, exposure), could this have any influence on the mud issue?

Interesting...maybe I'll slap the FD adapter on and see if 1080p 24p has issues with mud with my FD primes.
 
"http://vimeo.com/6198539

If anyone is interested in more boring footage of plants, fences and cars, take a look!

My 35mm cine lenses absolutely scream on this incredible camera; I am truly ecstatic for the future of this format, and can't wait to see what comes next!"


This was posted by Kevin Cartwright a few months ago, I remember it because I was really impressed by the beauty and quality of the footage, I cannot see any mud but I would like to hear what you think about it.
 
Interesting...maybe I'll slap the FD adapter on and see if 1080p 24p has issues with mud with my FD primes.
Interesting...maybe I'll slap the FD adapter on and see if 1080p 24p has issues with mud with my FD primes.
Try to do a controlled environment where you can exactly replicate the shot and the motion, so the only variable is what lens you have on.... that will tell us a lot about whether the stock lens influences the mud or not.
 
"http://vimeo.com/6198539

If anyone is interested in more boring footage of plants, fences and cars, take a look!

My 35mm cine lenses absolutely scream on this incredible camera; I am truly ecstatic for the future of this format, and can't wait to see what comes next!"


This was posted by Kevin Cartwright a few months ago, I remember it because I was really impressed by the beauty and quality of the footage, I cannot see any mud but I would like to hear what you think about it.

He has a shallow DOF which definitely helps with mud. However, you can see mud in his tilt up in the part where the truck drives by.
 
definitely can. i want to think it's the encoding for web, but probably not seeing how it didn't do it anywhere else. bummer. but not too worried about it. seems controllable.
 
Try to do a controlled environment where you can exactly replicate the shot and the motion, so the only variable is what lens you have on.... that will tell us a lot about whether the stock lens influences the mud or not.

Yeah, I'll do some tests and see what I can come up with.
 
He has a shallow DOF which definitely helps with mud. However, you can see mud in his tilt up in the part where the truck drives by.

Yes, you are right, there is some mud there but to me it seems less than what you would get with the stock lens. I look forward to the tests.
 
I haven't done any lab tests but speaking from experience, the mud issue does occur more often when the kit lens is attached, than when I'm using primes. The only thing to do is to try it yourself and see which works best for you.
 
It's possible it's more noticeable with the kit lens since a lot of the shots people are getting with the kit are shots they're not getting with their primes IE wide, deep depth of field, handheld shots, that would be very difficult on most fast primes with the 2x crop factor.

I use my kit mostly for run and gun (this can cause problems) as a telephoto lens for some narrative work, and as a wide angle.

I bet if you gave someone the kit and only let them use it at 140mm and open you wouldn't see quite so much mud with it because your shooting style would change...you'd be getting shallower DOF tripod stuff...you're not gonna be swinging a 140mm (well, 280mm) around handheld, and the DOF will be shallower....so basically what I'm saying is that even if it's the lens, it's the type of shooting you're doing with it (which you are probably totally right to be doing) that is causing mud...I know the kinds of shots I use my kit for are the kind that will be more prone to mud.
 
Here's what happens every time a photographer fires their flash in the same room as the GH1 while in 1080/24p.....


attachment.php



BEFORE the flash...

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • photog mud downsized.jpg
    photog mud downsized.jpg
    87.7 KB · Views: 0
  • photo no mud downsized.jpg
    photo no mud downsized.jpg
    106.9 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Ugh...that's really, really bad. How many frames does it affect and how noticeable is it when watching the footage? Was thinking maybe the flash going off would be enough to distract the eye away from this if it didn't happen in too many frames.
 
Back
Top