T-Stop equivalent in F-Stops?

dtjohns1

Well-known member
I was watching a behind the scenes featurette on hanibal and it showed how they shot each scene with the focal range, shutter speed, etc. displayed at the bottom. I noticed that they were shooting alot at t-stop 5.6 and I want to do the same with my 7d. I tried shooting 5.6 with my camera but the camera does't give me the same amount of dof they were getting so I figured t-stops must be different from f-stops along with a film frame being a little bit larger than aps-c. Does anyone know what the equivalent of 2.8, 4.0, and 5.6 would be in f-stops?
 
T-stops include the actual light transmission through the lens, whereas F-stop is the ratio of the focal length over the aperature. There is some good information here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number

One thing that has confused me is this; If I am setting up for DoF, wouldn't I want to know F-stop and not T-stop since F-stop is about the ability of the DoF, not the T-stop which is the light transmission. For instance, imagine putting an ND filter over a 30mm lens. You've decreases the light transmission but you've not affected the DoF. The T-stop would change but the F-stop would not. This is why I don't agree talking in T-stops makes total sense, other than matching transmission (exposure).
 
appreciate the info guys! sorry for such a novice question. can anyone tell me what f-stop films usually use on average?(i know this changes from shot to shot and situation to situation but if you could just give me a ballpark figure for a closeup, medium closeup, full and wide shot I would greatly appreciate it.
 
You can read about how films were shot in American Cinematographer magazine. The most commonly-repeated f-stop range is f/2.8 to f/4.
 
I thught f/3.5 on film/APS-C or f/5.6 on full frame was the most common DoF setting
I think I read it on shane hurlbut's (excellent) blog
 
T-stop is for exposure only. F-stop is for DOF.

Thanks :) The reason for the confusion was someone in another thread had made some kind of argument that lens should be rated in T-stops INSTEAD of F-stops, and for me, that just didn't make sense (rightly so) so I didn't know if I was confused about something. Although that said, I think having both designations would be good.
 
I thught f/3.5 on film/APS-C or f/5.6 on full frame was the most common DoF setting
I think I read it on shane hurlbut's (excellent) blog
f/3.5 is also known as a 2.8/4 split, and yes, it's very common. And yes, on a "full frame" camera like the 5D, it means you'd need 3x as much light, to be able to stop the iris down that much farther, to get the equivalent DOF at f/5.6.
 
Thanks :) The reason for the confusion was someone in another thread had made some kind of argument that lens should be rated in T-stops INSTEAD of F-stops, and for me, that just didn't make sense (rightly so) so I didn't know if I was confused about something. Although that said, I think having both designations would be good.

Cinema lenses are usually labeled with either just t-stops, or both t- and f-stops.
 
f/3.5 is also known as a 2.8/4 split, and yes, it's very common. And yes, on a "full frame" camera like the 5D, it means you'd need 3x as much light, to be able to stop the iris down that much farther, to get the equivalent DOF at f/5.6.

And people wonder why I say I'd rather shoot with the 7D all day every day. The 5D is a pain in the ass to light for. Of course, people who don't actually SHOOT narrative don't understand this argument.
 
And people wonder why I say I'd rather shoot with the 7D all day every day. The 5D is a pain in the ass to light for. Of course, people who don't actually SHOOT narrative don't understand this argument.

I understand. I used a 5D and was just not thrilled with full-frame. It seemed to me the 7D (and by that I mean APS-C sensor size) is really to me the best of both worlds.
 
Back
Top