Suggestions for a walkaround/documentary zoom lens to throw on a 2ti

i just picked up a used non VC for just over $300

I have a glidecam, tripods, and a rig so i dont think i really need the VC
 
PixelWrangler said:
Chris - Are you shooting on a DSLR now or are you waiting on the T2i?
Click to expand...

Waiting on the T2i. In fact I went by the local camera store and pre-purchased mine. I'm third in line in the queue so I should have mine when the first shipment arrives. I had to pay local sales tax but it's about what overnight shipping would be AND I don't have to worry about funds being taken out of my account when money might be low.

I'm hoping with tripods and my shoulder support, I won't need VC but we'll see soon!

Chris W
 
Chris Watson said:
I've been looking for clips shot with this lens and haven't found any myself. I took a gamble and got the non VC version for $450. Hopefully with the camera support, I won't need IS on the lens.
Click to expand...

You have to be careful handheld, but it can be done, but even in steady hands and on a wider angle, I still notice hints of jitter's here and there.

IMO it's worth the extra cash in the long run, but the non VC version should get the job done in careful hands.

It's also great for photos - may as well take advantage of everything it can do - if the light's low and you can get a few more stops out of stills with a flash unit - hell use that VC to your advantage.
 
To add to this thread it seems the Gh1 with Kit Lens on a budget is the better deal.

Sure if I had the money for $750+ lenses than this would not even be a discussion, but basically working on a budget I think the Gh1 with Kit lens is better or at least a step above the t2i with the 18-135mm lens, but when judging the t2i with the $100 kit lens ( @ $900) the Gh1 (@ $1200) is not even comparable.



peace

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

http://www.adorama.com/CA28105AFNU.html
THis lens for the t2i at $250 seems to be very good

28-105mm 3.5-4.5

--------------------------------
--------------------------------
 
Last edited:
Psynema said:
You have to be careful handheld, but it can be done, but even in steady hands and on a wider angle, I still notice hints of jitter's here and there.

IMO it's worth the extra cash in the long run, but the non VC version should get the job done in careful hands.

It's also great for photos - may as well take advantage of everything it can do - if the light's low and you can get a few more stops out of stills with a flash unit - hell use that VC to your advantage.
Click to expand...

Well I found a side by side comparison online of the non VC vs. VC and that convinced me to upgrade to the VC version. Here's the clip. It's pretty eye opening....

http://vimeo.com/8903333

None of my items shipped yet so I was able to change it. Thank goodness. I feel better about spending the little bit extra!
 
ROCKMORE said:
I agree the 17-40mm is limited, but in the end you will need more than a few lenses so better plan ahead. The 17-40mm is an L class lens at a lower than L class lens price, about half. I plan to add a 5D FF as soon as they release a new model with the upgrades complete from the factory. FF L lenses are a better value because they work on all formats. In the end you will want lenses from 10mm to 2000mm so to start building a high quality collection from the first lens is a smart investment. Every quality lens I ever bought I still have and use.
Try to look at the lens choices from the bad points and you will avoid buyers remorse in the future.
Click to expand...

The 17-40 F4L is a great lens. Add a fast 50 and you would be all set to start out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top