Stranger things - Season 2

OldCorpse

Rockin the Boat
I don't know if it's kosher to start a thread about a series where I've only watched the first two episodes, but here goes. Don't read if you don't want spoilers, though I don't think I'm doing much in the way of mentioning specific content, it's more general ruminations.

I'm a pretty big fan of ST season 1, so I was looking forward to season 2 with great hopes. I've only watched the first two episodes, and I honestly don't know if I can stomach watching more. It's just a giant disappointment. Almost nothing works for me here. Again - I'm talking about only the first two episodes. It seems extremely scattered and disconnected. It's as if the creators here just wanted to cram everything in, start as many subplots and plot lines as possible, but it has an extremely alienating effect, where you feel no continuity and as a result don't really care. Plus, when you have so many things introduced, it's often with super little depth. Tons of scenes and all shallow - not good. There seems insufficient throughlines, so that the scenes all feel disconneted, it's as if you could take all the scenes, mix them up and re-assemble at random - same effect. It absolutely promotes no engagement. And the scenes themselves are uninvolving.

The thing that was charming in the first season, here has been hamfistedly destroyed. Season one had a nostalgic feel of the 80's kids in movies Spielbergian aspect. Here the guys went way, way, way overboard, jamming in as many 80's references as they could - music, arcades and video games, movie references, but all super shallow. It's oppressive. And they attempt to hang drama arcs on these feeble uninvolving markers. Example: a whole bunch of time and effort is devoted to getting quarters together. Super keyed up fake urgency from the kids, robbing the sister's piggy bank and radio/w-t communicating between themselves, one-upmanship blah, blah, blah. You'd think it was all toward some substantial plot point. Nope, it was all to show how devoted they are to arcade games. Pffft... lame, lame, lame. The drama of the quarters in uninvolving in service of an uninvolving end. Waste of time and viewer patience.

Meanwhile the in your face cramming of 80's pop effluvia is at a certain point actually offensive. The whole Ghostbusters overlay - wow, I'd actually be embarrassed. This isn't some homage, or riff or reference - it's straight up appropriation, where they not only rip off the movie prop and character references, but - and now it crosses over into straight up appropriation, the MUSIC insistent soundtrack. This is OFFENSIVE, basically you're stealing the juice from the movie to prop up your lame-a$$ series. Because if the Ghostbusters theme music could be at least heard by the characters - diegetic - you'd have some excuse for featuring that music. But it's used extensively as simply the soundtrack, non-diegetically... and that's straight up theft, trying to prop up your lamo garbage with the music from a film. So, so lame.

And so on and on. Whole stretches that are just straight up boring. A sad contrast to the first season, where they would let characters sit in silence and do things things through implication and everything had some weight. Here there is tons of frenetic activity, nobody can sit still, and it all amounts to empty fireworks. We. Don't. Care.

And somehow, even the acting by the kids got worse - probably through no fault of their own, but the lines and the writing is so bad, that they can't make those lines sound plausible, so it just sounds fake and written and the impression is of bad insincere acting and lame lines. Winona Ryder was fantastic in season 1, here she is saddled with a relationship that we don't believe she'd go for, and it destroys her character. Just tragic all around. Plus, I think they overestimate how much people remember of the first season. F.ex. while I remembered what happened to the Barb character, my wife did not - as a result, when the two teenagers have dinner with the parents of Barb, my wife couldn't understand who they were, and why did those two go over there, for what purpose. As a matter of fact, even I who remembered the Barb subplot didn't see what the motivation for the dinner was.

Everything is hamfisted and clumsy. I expressed how disappointed I was in the first two episodes, and a friend who binge watched the whole thing said it gets much better later on. I guess I may have to do my grim duty and continue watching. My wife bailed. What's your take?
 
Pretty much feel the same as you. After about 20 minutes in it just didn't feel right and I began loosing interest. I will give it one more chance with episode 3 and if there is no improvement I am done with it. If you are looking for something really.. really good try "The Night Manager".
 
Last edited:
I'm a pretty big fan of ST season 1, so I was looking forward to season 2 with great hopes. I've only watched the first two episodes, and I honestly don't know if I can stomach watching more. It's just a giant disappointment. Almost nothing works for me here. Again - I'm talking about only the first two episodes. It seems extremely scattered and disconnected. It's as if the creators here just wanted to cram everything in, start as many subplots and plot lines as possible, but it has an extremely alienating effect, where you feel no continuity and as a result don't really care. Plus, when you have so many things introduced, it's often with super little depth. Tons of scenes and all shallow - not good. There seems insufficient throughlines, so that the scenes all feel disconneted, it's as if you could take all the scenes, mix them up and re-assemble at random - same effect. It absolutely promotes no engagement. And the scenes themselves are uninvolving.

Interesting. I've also just finished watch the second ep., and I couldn't be happier. I don't think there's anything you've written in the above paragraph that I agree with. For me it's really working; it's the first year with better production values.

But if you don't like it, you don't like it. Vive la difference.
 
Fascinating. It's genuinely interesting how different people's perceptions are - and I guess taste. It's why there are fans of series X but not fans of series Y and the other way around. Makes predicting who is going to like what not so easy. FWIW, I find f.ex. netflix recommendations don't work for me most of the time, I know for other it works brilliantly. I wish it worked better, as I'd love nothing more than have reliable recommendations - i.e. my taste. As they say, there is no arguing over preference "de gustibus non disputandum est", different strokes for different folks. Every film/series/book will find its audience.
 
Only watched the first ep so far, and haven't read any of the other posts, but for me, the first season grabbed from the get-go and was like having the '80s plugged directly into your brain. You could tell people who weren't there that yes, that's exactly what it was like.

This first episode didn't have that feel at all.

Will watch the rest, though.
 
Fascinating. It's genuinely interesting how different people's perceptions are - and I guess taste.

Absolutely. Humans are so weird, and so varied. I find (and I'm the first to admit it's probably just me) that comedy is the hardest. What makes one person ROFL leaves another thinking "meh". Knowing what do to and how to do it to reach the widest audience seems to be high skill indeed. Director Ivan Reitman had the touch. Which brings us right back to Ghost Busters.
 
Comedy is definitely the hardest, totally agree. Plus, what about when what's funny changes in a cultural context? It doesn't even have to take that long. I remember not long ago, you could joke about... actually I won't say - I don't want to get controversial, as that's against the TOS here, but I'm sure everyone can think of something. There are whole subjects, classes, people etc. who were the butt of jokes and it's totally not OK these days. Sometimes it moves super fast - I watched David Chappelle do a special very, very recently and he did a joke routine about "...." and it was very uncomforable for the audience and the reviews ripped him for that too - something that may be OK in one part of the country is already no longer OK in another. Amazing how fast things change. Sometimes that's good, sometimes feels a bit scary.

Now take that, and consider how long lasting something like Shakespeare's plays are, or the Illiad or whatnot that still has the power to affect hudreds or thousands of years later in a radically different society. And what has staying power - do Shakespear's comedies hold up as well as his other work? It's really an interesting subject. I'm glad you brought up humor! In fact there were some clear attempts at humor in Stranger Things in the two episodes that I watched - fell flat for me, but clearly not for others. Wild!
 
Neither Season 1 or 2 is perfect, but I found both of them to be very enjoyable across the board. Season 1 one was a little more ground-breaking, but it was also more predictable in terms of the mystery and characters. Season 2 was weaker in terms of mystery, as it was largely derivative of the mystery in Season 1, but it was less predictable overall and I thought that the characters were more fully fleshed-out and less cliche (with some exceptions).

They are both around an 8/10 for me.

SPOILERS:
My main complaints with Season 2 were with there not being enough Eleven and Max's obnoxious step-brother, who just seemed like a cliche amalgamation of 80's teen movie villains. They also kind of removed the Government as a villain, which I kind of missed, though it was nice twist that Paul Reiser's character ends up kind of being a good guy despite starting off looking like a retread of Dr. Brenner.
 
Well, I watched it, enjoyed it, felt good at the end. I'm not going to spend too much time thinking back on it, because I think I'll start to pick it apart, so I'm just letting it go.
 
Season one had the perfect 80's vibe, season two for me felt a little forced. I really liked both, but there was a palpable different feel for me.
 
Up to Ep 6. Still loving it. The writing/direction/editing is more aggressive and less nuanced than season 1, but this is up there with Breaking Bad and The Sopranos for me.
 
This season wasn't as strong as the first as a whole. Took a bit too long setting things up and defining the stakes. One advantage of a sequel is that you don't have to get people familiar with the characters . The first season hit the ground running. Here, it wasn't until episode three that the conflict started to take shape. And the cinematography wasn't as evocative of the period as it was in season one. But I couldn't have been happier with the last two episodes, so at least it closed out strong.
 
Back
Top