Curnsie
Well-known member
Hi
Here is a preview of a video I shot yesterday using the C100 which contains slo-mo gained using the 50i slowed to 50% and up to 25% in some cases on a 25p timeline in FCPx. For me the results are good except for the obviously slightly softer footage when compared to 25p footage from the C100. I reckon if i used After Effects to retime the slo-mo I'd get less jittery results in the jump at around 1.30 which is slowed to 25% - FCPx optical flow gave me weird anomalies. Obviously the ideal camera would be a FS700 for this sort of work but sometimes you have to work with what you've got!
https://vimeo.com/96621904
EDIT: I updated this video adding music and a title at the end - I added Frame Blending in FCPx which helped to remove some of the stuttering in the slowest footage (optical flow just didn't work as the results where not good). I also experimented with slowing the footage down in After Effects using "Frame Mix" frame blending but felt it was only a little better than what FCPx could do. Good results using Timewarp or Twixtor in AE are not possible without a lot of masking and rotoscoping etc. Tbh As I said above, in order to get the sort of superslomo used in this type of video you would be better using a FS700 or similar camera. However, as a basic slo-mo tool, the C100 holds up quite well - I have a GH4 on the way so I can't wait to try its flavour of 96fps.
Here is a preview of a video I shot yesterday using the C100 which contains slo-mo gained using the 50i slowed to 50% and up to 25% in some cases on a 25p timeline in FCPx. For me the results are good except for the obviously slightly softer footage when compared to 25p footage from the C100. I reckon if i used After Effects to retime the slo-mo I'd get less jittery results in the jump at around 1.30 which is slowed to 25% - FCPx optical flow gave me weird anomalies. Obviously the ideal camera would be a FS700 for this sort of work but sometimes you have to work with what you've got!
https://vimeo.com/96621904
EDIT: I updated this video adding music and a title at the end - I added Frame Blending in FCPx which helped to remove some of the stuttering in the slowest footage (optical flow just didn't work as the results where not good). I also experimented with slowing the footage down in After Effects using "Frame Mix" frame blending but felt it was only a little better than what FCPx could do. Good results using Timewarp or Twixtor in AE are not possible without a lot of masking and rotoscoping etc. Tbh As I said above, in order to get the sort of superslomo used in this type of video you would be better using a FS700 or similar camera. However, as a basic slo-mo tool, the C100 holds up quite well - I have a GH4 on the way so I can't wait to try its flavour of 96fps.
Last edited: