Screw Premiere - I'm switching to Vegas

But all is not as it was. Since Sony bought Vegas, it's headed on a more proprietary bent. It started with the HVX, where Vegas wouldn't support the MXF file structure -- Vegas only supports Sony MXF files. It continues with AVC-HD, where Vegas only supports Sony AVC-HD:

That is so typical of them, like with their laptops sporting the stupid Memory Stick for so long and no SD slots.
 
Any editor out there is going to have difficulty with some type of file....especially HD. You just need to get the correct plug-ins to make it work.
 
From my experience almost all the problems I've had with applications, both video and music, turned out to be compatibility issues. The programs themselves work well. I use my computer for everything; video, music, internet. There's one particular sampling program from Tascam that when put on the same computer with a bunch of other stuff causes frequent crashes. Tascam, however, warns you of this.
Dave M.
 
John, I'm confused why as a mod you would jump into this discussing with such a polarizing statement. Premiere is a proven NLE and it's evident that many people here have used it successfully. This forum discourages debates on "which cameras is the best," so why not have the same policy for NLE?


That was a joke Jade. Try and not take things too seriously when it comes to discussing an NLE. But I do apologize if I offended you :beer:

Some people like Premiere, some like FCP and the rest of the all knowing like Vegas.


See, that was another joke ! :cheesy:

-

But really, no matter what your preference is, Vegas seems to be designed by people who actually edit.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the info John. I am going to see what vegas is all about. I am old and decrepit, but I dont mind learning something new. Especially if it aint as panzy as premier has been to me lately...
 
It's funny

Dave showed me some FCP and Vegas comparisons the other day (Yes, Dave has an IMac and FCP in his house) and something as simple as splitting a clip and creating a transition in FCP seemed to be like jumping over fences whereas Vegas was like Hit S, Click and Drag = Done

That's all I want. I just want simple and efficient.

-

I have found all of Adobes products to be simply not making sense. I use Photoshop (who does not?) and am atleast intermediate but to this day am constantly saying 'What the hell ... that's lame'
 
The only advantage to running something like fcp, premiere, or avid ( which I find to have a much larger learning curve than the others) is that you have a better chance of getting a job in a post house, cause I see very little postings out there listing vegas experience. I'm not discrediting vegas at all, I have never used it but a friend of mine has had sucess with it, just that it has not made its way into the professional world yet.

But.....if you are just doing your own thing, then use what you are most comfortable with. They all basically do the same thing.
 
The only advantage to running something like fcp, premiere, or avid ( which I find to have a much larger learning curve than the others) is that you have a better chance of getting a job in a post house, cause I see very little postings out there listing vegas experience.
I have yet to see a serious position that required Premiere. Avid and FCP, yes. Shake, Smoke and Combustion too.
 
Giving people an update here. One of the reasons I hated Premiere was that it wouldn't capture video from any camcorder I set it up with. I always had to use another program. People "in the know" discredited me as an imbocile and said I was having hardware issues. Hmm, well, first time I ever tried capturing with Vegas (HD footage mind you), it just recognized my camera right away and started capturing. Imagine that.

I sat there in shock because I was waiting for someone to jump around the corner and go "just kidding" and my computer would crash. But it just worked. Amazing.
 
I agree that Vegas is the least picky NLE and the most intuitive. I don't particularly like the interface and the way it forces you to work but that's just personal preference. It's a great program. I'm glad it's working for you.
 
yes. which means vegas requires much less from your system. something I believe people should know.

It doesn't mean that at all. What it does mean is that your current system configuration happens to be in the acceptable range for Vegas. There's all sorts of factor that can screw with your programs, and it's not always a question of better or worst hardware. I've had softwares before that'll refused to work unless I change the RAM brand. Older versions of Premiere can sometimes stop working when you have certain codecs installed.

The only conclusion you can draw is that your computer is incompatible with Premiere; it's possible there's a piece of hardware that doesn't play nice or some software that's screwing with it. If you post your system specs I'm willing to bet that someone on here (possibly even me) is running a worse rig yet have Premiere working just fine.

Heck, the first time I ran PP 2.0 was on a 2.4 Ghz single core computer with 1.5 GB of RAM and I could still edit HDV.
 
Last edited:
We'll call it a nice coincidence then. With premiere, the coincidences always seemed to work against me rather than for me. Coincidence? I'm not sure. But I'll take it.
 
in the issue of fairness, I will continue to post both the good and the bad of Vegas. I have just run into my first problem. After importing all of my footage, all of it plays very stuttery. I'm not sure whether this is a simple preference I am overlooking, or something more final. Either way, I am still not able to edit my footage. Going on over 20 days now.
 
It's probably the pulldown that weren't removed.

But I agree with saturnin that this thread is played out. Chris, I think you should start a new thread in the Vegas section of the forum with a less negative title to discuss your technical issue.
 
Back
Top