Scene File(s) - why not just change in post?
- Thread starter toddgeer
- Start date
Mike Harvey
Veteran
I would simply rather not have to deal with it in post. If I know the look I want, and I can get it in camera, I don't see the point of not getting it that way. Saves time later.
additionally, i've found that i get better results shooting the look i want in-camera rather than trying to wrestle an image into another shape in post.
i know people say it's theoretically equivalent, but my eyeballs tell me different!
and, as mike stated, you save a lot of time.
and shooting this way encourages you to think like an editor and forces you to know what look you're working towards.....things that will greatly improve efficiency and quality overall.
i know people say it's theoretically equivalent, but my eyeballs tell me different!
and, as mike stated, you save a lot of time.
and shooting this way encourages you to think like an editor and forces you to know what look you're working towards.....things that will greatly improve efficiency and quality overall.
The sharpness & coring settings can't be fixed or undone much in post, although you can very effectively sharpen in post.
Also the knee setting affecting the retention of highlights can't be duplicated in post. I.E. you won't get highlights back in post.
Most everything else can be addressed in post. But it's always easier the closer you are to the look you want natively.
Plus like Denwa said, tweaking for noise reduction is key.
Also the knee setting affecting the retention of highlights can't be duplicated in post. I.E. you won't get highlights back in post.
Most everything else can be addressed in post. But it's always easier the closer you are to the look you want natively.
Plus like Denwa said, tweaking for noise reduction is key.
+1. I was just to lazy to type all that.