Rolling Shutter according to RED

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is really productive guys. Why don't you go hang out in the Cafe forum for these kind of arguments. I am learning absolutely nothing from you and have nothing to contribute. This is a thread about REDs view on CMOS technology and you have completely hijacked it into bickering. There is nothing quite like seeing a thread about "RED and CMOS" and entering to learn nothing about it except cyber-fighting. Please stop. Find a thread where you have something valueable to say. Ask questions. Learn. Let someone learn from you.
 
Last edited:
True dat. I'm guilty of being too goofy. I'll try and cut the goof factor, I realize it's not informative. If the moderators wanna chop out the silliness from this thread, that's cool. Spank me once.
 
You don't see us hanging in the HVX200 user forum bashing that camera. We expect the same here.

God forbid going over to the HVX forum and saying anything negative about this cam vs the HVX. I don't mind people criticizing the EX1 but I'd prefer it coming from someone who actually has used the cam extensively rather then someone who probably can't bear the fact that his CCD camera is going the way of the dinosaur.
 
Yeah thats right... RDykmans i'll refer you to TheMusician

Why do you keep responding to me?

Do you have anything relevant, based on real world experience with a RED or an EX1 to contribute? It's easier to get respect with some real experience rather then personal attacks and sarcasm.
 
Um you need to calm down, and i responded by referring you to a poster above. Folks got over sensitive with a discussion, me and buck joked about it, you seem to be going off your rocker... relax
 
Um you need to calm down, and i responded by referring you to a poster above. Folks got over sensitive with a discussion, me and buck joked about it, you seem to be going off your rocker... relax

Seems the one going off his rocker is you. You're dead air.

I have a RED, and an Canon HF10 and have used the EX1. Rolling shutter is a minor inconvenience at best when you see the most amazing resolution these cams put out. The idea of going back to the HVX is ridiculous. Also ridiculous are the false postings that long GOP 4.2.0 and AVCHd is too difficult to edit and color correct.

If this board taught me anything is to never be swayed by forum postings and to try these cams for yourself to see the truth that meets your needs.
 
Enough is enough, this is a case of fanboys getting a little over excited.

I'm dead air?

Okay mico... have your rant but BEFORE directing it at me- have you even read what i said, cos it was like 2 pages ago...

My point was that the evolution of cmos tech will make it amenable to me in future because its drawbacks aren't at present. That is the opinion of many... while RED is improving the cmos for a REASON....

I don't think anything im saying is so radical... your denounciation of everything so far critical of cmos Mico, is yourself getting a little over excited not me mate. Its just an opinion, and this is a free discussion. Why so many folks try to make this personal, and try to 'frame' people, or their arguments for automatic comebacks and put downs is ridiculous.

Take me and Buck, we both post frequently, but guess what, we can agree to disagree and even joke about it...

Cmos as it is - is an issue for many, but so were the reasons people left other cams to invest in the benefits of cmos cams, that on its own, is hardly the stuff of passion is it? But men's egos it would seem are another.
 
Last edited:
Enough is enough, this is a case of fanboys getting a little over excited.

I'm dead air?

Okay mico... have your rant but BEFORE directing it at me- have you even read what i said, cos it was like 2 pages ago...

My point was that the evolution of cmos tech will make it amenable to me in future because its drawbacks aren't at present. That is the opinion of many... while RED is improving the cmos for a REASON....

I don't think anything im saying is so radical... your denounciation of everything so far critical of cmos Mico, is yourself getting a little over excited not me mate. Its just an opinion, and this is a free discussion. Why so many folks try to make this personal, and try to 'frame' people, or their arguments for automatic comebacks and put downs is ridiculous.

Take me and Buck, we both post frequently, but guess what, we can agree to disagree and even joke about it...

Cmos as it is - is an issue for many, but so were the reasons people left other cams to invest in the benefits of cmos cams, that on its own, is hardly the stuff of passion is it? But men's egos it would seem are another.

Everyones over excited but you huh?
Oh so you speak for the "many" now?
Really who the hell cares if you will find cmos tech amenable to you in the future. You post on a forum where you've had countless responses from people saying they enjoy their cmos cams and instead of going out and finding out why their having such a good time, we have to hear this stupid refrain of cmos is not ready over and over again ad nauseam.

How can cmos purchasers be fanboys when the the site is dedicated to the other chip?

Are all these cmos users deluding themselves in your eyes?

Did you ever stop to think that most of these cmos users had an HVX and sold them like I did ?

I'd like to know what compels you to keep telling us you're not ready for cmos?

Okay you're not ready...Bye.
 
Thanks Mico, you just saved me a lot of typing.

With comments like "from another planet" and "fanboy" and then this: "Why so many folks try to make this personal, and try to 'frame' people, or their arguments for automatic comebacks and put downs is ridiculous."

That's just classic!

I'm done with this as well. Bye . . . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top