gunleik Well-known member Sep 27, 2006 #1 A while back Apple released the pixelet codec, that I've so far seen noone using (Except from internaly at Pixar if I'm not wrong, which sorta certifies the quality). From the name I guess this is a wavelet codec. Are these in relation? Gunleik
A while back Apple released the pixelet codec, that I've so far seen noone using (Except from internaly at Pixar if I'm not wrong, which sorta certifies the quality). From the name I guess this is a wavelet codec. Are these in relation? Gunleik
Graeme_Nattress Red Team Sep 27, 2006 #2 Pixlet - that's funny. I remember that now.... http://www.lafcpug.org/reviews/review_sheer_video.html It's not very good though..... Graeme
Pixlet - that's funny. I remember that now.... http://www.lafcpug.org/reviews/review_sheer_video.html It's not very good though..... Graeme
agwah Well-known member Sep 27, 2006 #3 Hi Graeme or anyone else, Is there a good source book of codecs, understanding compression, how to maintain top image quality through the production chain etc.
Hi Graeme or anyone else, Is there a good source book of codecs, understanding compression, how to maintain top image quality through the production chain etc.
Graeme_Nattress Red Team Sep 27, 2006 #4 I don't think there is. Codec law is guru stuff, usually handed down in cryptic forum posts or articles. Marco Solario has a great codec resource page: http://codecs.onerivermedia.com/ But really, as every workflow is different, you've got to do the experiment yourself, with your own gear and choices to maximize quality. Graeme
I don't think there is. Codec law is guru stuff, usually handed down in cryptic forum posts or articles. Marco Solario has a great codec resource page: http://codecs.onerivermedia.com/ But really, as every workflow is different, you've got to do the experiment yourself, with your own gear and choices to maximize quality. Graeme
F Fugitive Well-known member Sep 27, 2006 #5 Graeme, looks like you have a book to write Anyway, care to explain why you thought the pixelet codec wasnt good?
Graeme, looks like you have a book to write Anyway, care to explain why you thought the pixelet codec wasnt good?
agwah Well-known member Sep 27, 2006 #6 thanks, looking better already Attachments source.jpg 65.5 KB · Views: 0
Graeme_Nattress Red Team Sep 27, 2006 #7 8bit only, slow, and inferior quality to PhotoJPEG at the same bit rate. ie, PhotoJPEG was better in every way I could think of. Graeme
8bit only, slow, and inferior quality to PhotoJPEG at the same bit rate. ie, PhotoJPEG was better in every way I could think of. Graeme