Norm Sanders
Script Wrangler
Okay, so I just HAD to read the posts on this page at least, to see what was at least supposed to happen, because when the film ended I was completely lost.
I dug the opening, the look of the film (nice shooting), the survival tricks & how rugged this guy was (looked like Patrick Dempsey, when laying on the carpet in a pool of his own blood).
Definitely reaching into a pot like that would be a "HUH?!" issue. When I saw him in his apartment, I was assuming this was BEFORE he went camping, and he was having flashbacks of some lost memory ... so I questioned why he wasn't clean shaven to show the growth he acquired for being stuck in the woods for days on end. Now I don't know what it was, memory, imagination/hallucination, what?
I DUG the style of the editing, but I wish I could say it was good editing ... but I can't say that, and that's because it appears the majority of the people aren't getting your story. And if they're not getting the story, or what you're trying to say, then of course it could be a directing issue, but it's also an editing issue .... it needs to flow, and the right information needs to be in there at the right times, for the majority of your intended audience to 'get it'.
Performance was SOLID on the lead, and he's got a great look. Again, a TON of strengths about this, technically speaking, but the story was lost to me, unfortunately.
Oh yeah, and like others before me have said, you kept me with the film, because of the edit style, showing us bits & pieces ... so I had no problem at all watching it. It's just that when it ended, I was left with "So what happened? I don't get it?".
I dug the opening, the look of the film (nice shooting), the survival tricks & how rugged this guy was (looked like Patrick Dempsey, when laying on the carpet in a pool of his own blood).
Definitely reaching into a pot like that would be a "HUH?!" issue. When I saw him in his apartment, I was assuming this was BEFORE he went camping, and he was having flashbacks of some lost memory ... so I questioned why he wasn't clean shaven to show the growth he acquired for being stuck in the woods for days on end. Now I don't know what it was, memory, imagination/hallucination, what?
I DUG the style of the editing, but I wish I could say it was good editing ... but I can't say that, and that's because it appears the majority of the people aren't getting your story. And if they're not getting the story, or what you're trying to say, then of course it could be a directing issue, but it's also an editing issue .... it needs to flow, and the right information needs to be in there at the right times, for the majority of your intended audience to 'get it'.
Performance was SOLID on the lead, and he's got a great look. Again, a TON of strengths about this, technically speaking, but the story was lost to me, unfortunately.
Oh yeah, and like others before me have said, you kept me with the film, because of the edit style, showing us bits & pieces ... so I had no problem at all watching it. It's just that when it ended, I was left with "So what happened? I don't get it?".