Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does anyone know the real reason why it was pulled? Was it because of the content or mentioned technical difficulties? Or was it just not as "polished" as Reverie was, considering Reverie actually did utilize creative lighting versus shooting under available conditions?
It would be really interesting to know exactly why it was pulled.
For a still. But how does it affect motion? Does the underlying alias pattern still exhibit itself, just without the color effect?
Blurring chroma will work for "rainbows", but not for the "line twittering" from aliasing (e.g. the opening sequence when the camera pans over the stripped shirt)
Funny gossip stuff regarding the request:
http://www.kareldonk.com/karel/2009/10/22/canon-inc-takes-down-video-by-vincent-laforet/
http://photobusinessforum.blogspot.com/2009/10/canon-usa-vs-canon-inc-dont-eat-your.html
more a question of making Canon Japan look bad? You decide!! lol
Lo~l. Thanks, Pirata.
The comments about steadicams in the second link are priceless. Just goes to show you how the merger is about to bring out supreme ignorance.
Lo~l. Thanks, Pirata.
The comments about steadicams in the second link are priceless. Just goes to show you how the merger is about to bring out supreme ignorance.
I'm half-asian decent but ultimately an American so the jokes don't bother me. It's obviously exaggerated, all in fun, might even have a hint of truth. I don't see what the problem is. Maybe it's a little offensive, but lots of people enjoy offensive humor purely for the sake of its offensiveness, myself included. I think it ultimately pokes fun at nationalism itself.