Hi all, I had a search around for a similar thread but didn't really see one. I'm thinking about a DSLR purchase, purely for video. I think Ill take probably under 100 photos a year so still image is almost irrelevant as the differences will be minimal.
I want to know why I would need to buy a 60D when the 600 seems to be exactly the same camera (for video purposes anyway). Obviously the 5D is full frame and I believe the 7D is environmentally sealed but between the 60 and the 600 seems to be very little if anything. I am on quite a tight camera budget so is the difference really worth it? Is it worth waiting for the *rumoured* Digic 5 powered 700D or whatever they may or may not announce in September?
I know I want to go DSLR, I'm just not sure which of the two.
Any suggestions or opinions? Is there a definitive answer to why I should go 60D?
Thanks in advance
I want to know why I would need to buy a 60D when the 600 seems to be exactly the same camera (for video purposes anyway). Obviously the 5D is full frame and I believe the 7D is environmentally sealed but between the 60 and the 600 seems to be very little if anything. I am on quite a tight camera budget so is the difference really worth it? Is it worth waiting for the *rumoured* Digic 5 powered 700D or whatever they may or may not announce in September?
I know I want to go DSLR, I'm just not sure which of the two.
Any suggestions or opinions? Is there a definitive answer to why I should go 60D?
Thanks in advance