Danilo Del Tufo
Well-known member
After reading all this hypothesis, I want to express a little thought.
Cameras are a medium, the cost of this medium must be in a relationship at all the others things you need to make a movie.
I'd like to hear from Jim Jannard (or evr'yone else involved to build a camera) an honestly speaking, saying something:- "We know that evr'yone interested to make a movie, or a short film, needs to combine various elements: lighting, screenplay, editing, actors, music and spend all the time to make a valuable project.
We want the revolution. Ours idea of Revolution it's not build a camera with faboulous settings and a prohibitive price tag, because we know very well how a camera it's important but not so important in total. We've observed for years cameras having a prohibitive price tag - simple offering a quality that we have alright reached with digital cameras - and we know that if you are under a big company, renting them doing a calibrated and specific use with the amount of hundred of people was the only way to make a valuable project. Much of this project went bankrupt, they became uncompleted work.
This has killed various cinema projects, and results were hundred of hundred of commercial movies, without a soul.
This philosophy is behind ours idea of Revolution, we want contaminate the system with this idea."
I'd really like to hear a quote like this from Jim Jannard (or whatewer company), think about cellular telephones, when they hit the market had big prices, but when a lot of companies start to take the prices down, cellular telephones became an object used in daily life.
If I am into the shoes of Jim Jannard I'd like to say something like this, but hope a day hearing a guy say something like this.
Ciao Jim!
RE(volution)D(ay), think about it
Cameras are a medium, the cost of this medium must be in a relationship at all the others things you need to make a movie.
I'd like to hear from Jim Jannard (or evr'yone else involved to build a camera) an honestly speaking, saying something:- "We know that evr'yone interested to make a movie, or a short film, needs to combine various elements: lighting, screenplay, editing, actors, music and spend all the time to make a valuable project.
We want the revolution. Ours idea of Revolution it's not build a camera with faboulous settings and a prohibitive price tag, because we know very well how a camera it's important but not so important in total. We've observed for years cameras having a prohibitive price tag - simple offering a quality that we have alright reached with digital cameras - and we know that if you are under a big company, renting them doing a calibrated and specific use with the amount of hundred of people was the only way to make a valuable project. Much of this project went bankrupt, they became uncompleted work.
This has killed various cinema projects, and results were hundred of hundred of commercial movies, without a soul.
This philosophy is behind ours idea of Revolution, we want contaminate the system with this idea."
I'd really like to hear a quote like this from Jim Jannard (or whatewer company), think about cellular telephones, when they hit the market had big prices, but when a lot of companies start to take the prices down, cellular telephones became an object used in daily life.
If I am into the shoes of Jim Jannard I'd like to say something like this, but hope a day hearing a guy say something like this.
Ciao Jim!
RE(volution)D(ay), think about it
Last edited:
