I put both parts together and here is my "test video" from C100:
https://vimeo.com/62569403
A day and night, the beautiful town Prague and my new EOS C100
Production: EF-S 18-135mm/f3.5-f5.6, EF 70-300mm/f3.5-f5.6, EF 50mm/f1.4, EF-S Tokina 11-16mm/f2.8
50i or 25p, ISO850 - 5000. Cine1, WDR and Canon-log gamma.
Postproduction: Avid Symphony 6.5.2, AVCHD clips were converted to XDCAM EX HQ 35Mbps (1920x1080, 420), clips were color corrected in Avid Symphony (renders are sometime to XDCAM EX HQ or Avid DNxHD 185Mbps 422), two short parts are interlaced (deinterlaced with Avid fluid timewarp), exported direct from timeline (25p).
It was very cold, I shot three days (night). Cine1 gamma has less noise than WDR and Canon-log, but sometimes WDR or log is better on high dynamic scenes. One shot is from the XF100 .-) .
https://vimeo.com/62569403
A day and night, the beautiful town Prague and my new EOS C100
Production: EF-S 18-135mm/f3.5-f5.6, EF 70-300mm/f3.5-f5.6, EF 50mm/f1.4, EF-S Tokina 11-16mm/f2.8
50i or 25p, ISO850 - 5000. Cine1, WDR and Canon-log gamma.
Postproduction: Avid Symphony 6.5.2, AVCHD clips were converted to XDCAM EX HQ 35Mbps (1920x1080, 420), clips were color corrected in Avid Symphony (renders are sometime to XDCAM EX HQ or Avid DNxHD 185Mbps 422), two short parts are interlaced (deinterlaced with Avid fluid timewarp), exported direct from timeline (25p).
It was very cold, I shot three days (night). Cine1 gamma has less noise than WDR and Canon-log, but sometimes WDR or log is better on high dynamic scenes. One shot is from the XF100 .-) .
