Barry_Green
Moderator
Really, "matsush ita" is irrelevant. The company changed their name officially to "Panasonic" years ago... There is no "Matsush ita" anymore.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really, "matsush ita" is irrelevant. The company changed their name officially to "Panasonic" years ago... There is no "Matsush ita" anymore.
No new posts in 12 hours.
I think it's time for some more info. :lipsrseal
Thank you Mitch for answer and another question from me:
will be option to taking a full resolution raw photo with EVA on SD card? It would be nice for people like me which works in photography and filmaking.
I don't know that we'll have stills grab capability in EVA1.
Please have them concentrate on the PROFESSIONAL Motion side of the camera, some might use the stills mode but I believe they are the extreme minority.
Thank you Mitch for answer and another question from me:
will be option to taking a full resolution raw photo with EVA on SD card? It would be nice for people like me which works in photography and filmaking.
Thanks Mitch for fielding all these questions! I have a bit of a different kind. It's been mentioned that the sensor is still in testing, and there are plenty of details you can't share yet about the sensor and camera in general. For the details that aren't secretwhat's the process by which Panasonic is still deciding these features, and what are these tests like?
Hi Mitch,
Just watched(actually dissecting) your interview at Band Pro. At 1:35 you start talking about the internal recording of the EVA1:
"4K at up to 60fps and 2K at 240fps and that recording on SD-XC cards. In that recording, you're going to have the ability to go 4:2:2 in 10bit SO NONE OF THIS 8BIT STUFF you're going to have this very rich recording not 4:2:0...4:2:2."
So is it safe to say internal 4K 60P and 2K at 240fps will be 4:2:2 10bit(none of this 8bit stuff)? You seemed very careful how you worded things...perhaps a Freudian slip?
https://vimeo.com/222376518
I'm really not going to go into details here; that's corporate secret type stuff. But I can tell you that with all technology there is the spec in theory v the performance in practice. You put the stuff together with certain theoretical expectations and discover what it is actually doing. That performance can be due to certain hidden interactions or odd hidden issues. Sometimes it can actually mean increased performance. So you go from what you think it will be to what it actually is, and then you figure out how to adjust to get it where you want.
The same thing goes for software. Ask anyone who codes and they'll tell you programming is 10% original writing and 90% bug hunting. You discover some weird interaction between two parts of a program that you would never think had anything to do with one another. Same deal in physical stuff.