MichaelTiemann
Active member
Many people will pay extra for 2x the pixels and full 1080p.
What do you mean by "only 1080"?
No 720p60.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Many people will pay extra for 2x the pixels and full 1080p.
What do you mean by "only 1080"?
A baby takes nine months. You can't get a baby in one month by throwing nine women at the problem.
![]()
Many people will pay extra for 2x the pixels and full 1080p.
What do you mean by "only 1080"?
No 720 settings.
I don't think the videocamera industry moves any slower than any other
I do. I saw the need for a S35 sensor in 1993(ish), as I sought shallow focus in my 1/2" videocamera. I don't think waiting over 15 years is impatient.
In 2000 they had a digital SLR that was 2K, S35, CCD. Of course, it could not shoot 60 or even 24 frames per second. But 10 years, and they still can't work it out?
1920x1080x30 has been Panasonic's limit for years (which was news to me, actually, because I thought even the first Varicams did true 720p60)
There are many options and there will be more by the end of the year. It's just that if you want many of they key features at the best variant it will be impossible or cost a fortune. You have to decide what is more important to you.
-s35, 2/3", 1/2", 1/3", 1/4" DOF
-big, medium, small pixel size
-global shutter, rolling shutter
-4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p sensor
-uncompressed, good intraframe, low res intraframe, GOP, low quality GOP, consumer GOP compression
-extreme slow motion, 2x slow motion, no slow motion
-interchangeable lens, fixed lens
I thought even the first Varicams did true 720p60)
.
1080 is not a good solution for sports, or at least not in pal land where this means 25p if going progressive. 720p50 is a way better solution, the difference between 1080 and 720 broadcast is in the real world impossible to see for the average viewer.Not that important to many people I guess. Some prefer the 1080/30p Panasonics vs the more affordable 60p models with 720p and 540p sensors.
1080 is not a good solution for sports, or at least not in pal land where this means 25p if going progressive. 720p50 is a way better solution, the difference between 1080 and 720 broadcast is in the real world impossible to see for the average viewer.
That`s untill you plug the bluray player into a proper surround system...and load a typical blockbusterWith so many 720p channels, so many 1366x768 and 1024x768 TVs and the typical viewing distance for TVs, that's quite probable. I can hardly tell DVD for Bluray in most homes.
a flexible tool capable of both 1080/720 would be nice.
:happy:...OK, a real (optional) interchangeable VF, two wheels for ND/CC filter...
Preliminary brochure.
At this point, if it doesn't output 4:4:4, if it's not a Varicam, if it does not record 720p VFR, and if it has just 2 P2 Card slots, the Hpx3100's price range cannot be so unreachable...I am sure it will have a great image. It will be interesting to see the price.
Hi!i know 300 series is 1/3" sensor and 2700/3000 are 2/3" sensor and also better technical capturing abilities also.
can any one give those technical abilities in understandable manner at all with comparing products in my question too. and include the hpx 500 seriec also for comparision.