So, season 2 dropped a few days ago, and I just finished watching the 10 episodes. After an excellent season 1:
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?358297-Ozark-Season-1
the big question was - would season 2 hold up? Be worse? Better? How would they handle recapping to re-orient the audience and remind them of key developments in season 1? So many challenges. And so many shows fail this transition - to *me*, a terrible example is Strange Things, where I loved, loved, loved season 1, and could not watch beyond the first episode of season 2, so utterly did they mishandle recapping season 1 and degrading everything that was good in season 1 - an epic failure (in my eyes). Or things just went off the rails completely - loved season 1 of True Detective and season 2 which really had nothing to do with season 1 was just a gigantic fail (funnily enough, season 3 of True Detective will apparently take place in the Ozarks
).
The short of it - LOVED season 2 of Ozark just as much as season 1. I thought they handled the recapping brilliantly. And set up season 3 very, very nicely. Everything that was great about season 1, was also great in season 2 - very nice plot developments which never felt forced (as so often happens in TV series as the natural premise gets exhausted and writers hunt for ways to prolong things). The tension was handled well, with almost all episodes (save one) consistently keeping you at the edge of your seat. Characters evolved realistically, without major inconsistencies (the most frequent flaw in TV series - when you feel that a given character would never do something based on his previous portrayal). Excellent acting from everyone continues, just as in season one, there's really not a bad performance from anyone here.
I must say, I've thoroughly enjoyed this series. I have not seen everything Netflix has done, or indeed the rest of the wave of TV content available these days, but of the things I've seen, this is by far the best.
Oh, also, Jason Bateman is actually a good director! So often actors are given a vanity directing opportunity and they deliver mediocre or worse results, but Bateman is legit good!
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?358297-Ozark-Season-1
the big question was - would season 2 hold up? Be worse? Better? How would they handle recapping to re-orient the audience and remind them of key developments in season 1? So many challenges. And so many shows fail this transition - to *me*, a terrible example is Strange Things, where I loved, loved, loved season 1, and could not watch beyond the first episode of season 2, so utterly did they mishandle recapping season 1 and degrading everything that was good in season 1 - an epic failure (in my eyes). Or things just went off the rails completely - loved season 1 of True Detective and season 2 which really had nothing to do with season 1 was just a gigantic fail (funnily enough, season 3 of True Detective will apparently take place in the Ozarks
The short of it - LOVED season 2 of Ozark just as much as season 1. I thought they handled the recapping brilliantly. And set up season 3 very, very nicely. Everything that was great about season 1, was also great in season 2 - very nice plot developments which never felt forced (as so often happens in TV series as the natural premise gets exhausted and writers hunt for ways to prolong things). The tension was handled well, with almost all episodes (save one) consistently keeping you at the edge of your seat. Characters evolved realistically, without major inconsistencies (the most frequent flaw in TV series - when you feel that a given character would never do something based on his previous portrayal). Excellent acting from everyone continues, just as in season one, there's really not a bad performance from anyone here.
I must say, I've thoroughly enjoyed this series. I have not seen everything Netflix has done, or indeed the rest of the wave of TV content available these days, but of the things I've seen, this is by far the best.
Oh, also, Jason Bateman is actually a good director! So often actors are given a vanity directing opportunity and they deliver mediocre or worse results, but Bateman is legit good!
Last edited: