Online conference proposal

Vitaliy Kiselev

Vitaliy Kiselev

Carbonite Member
Here is small proposal to make closed online conference.

I invite Panasonic GH1 USA manager (personal invitation will be sent),
Panasonic Lumix USA manager (same thing), Japan Lumix group guys,
Panasonic Australia guys, Panasonic France Lumix manager.

I also specially invide James and Barry to take part in this.

It is in all community interests to make clear my position to Panasonic managers (I had talks only to few of them, not in the list above) and to make clear Panasonic position to Lumix community and specifically to this project.

Please leave short note if you support this.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Are you asking dvxuser members if we support this?
I support this
Thanks for all you've done vitaliy
 
Yes, such an online 'face-to-face' discussion would only surely help in getting this communities interests and those of Panasonic- out into the open.
David Taylor
 
icon1.gif


Give the man his conference!
 
Vitaliy Kiselev said:
Something tells me that they'll participate.
It is in the extreme interests of Panasonic.
Click to expand...

We do hope so. It is also in the interest of those of us who bought into m4/3 lens systems.

Kindly take our concerns to them.

A bug free AVCHD codec at the specified limit of 24 mbits should be perhaps the most we can realistically hope from them and it may even work the same way as say 40 mbits footage of current GH13. The obvious candidates like PAL<>NTSC, Language etc. must be there too..
 
Vitaliy Kiselev said:
Something tells me that they'll participate.
It is in the extreme interests of Panasonic.
Click to expand...

Sure. I support the meeting.

Wow. What a load of baloney. Vitaliy seems to find it necessary to edit my response so that it shows unequivocal support. I guess only his opinions as to what is or is not in the interest of Panasonic are allowed to be posted.

Actually, after reviewing other posts, I see that my assessment is not correct. Vitaliy does not seem to have edited the posts of others who have shared his opinion. So clearly the problem is not one of saying more than "for" or "against." Additional opinions are allowed so long as those aren't the "wrong" opinions.
 
Last edited:
Of course, I support this.

I am pretty sure they will attend the online conference. Why should they not?
There is only a lot to gain and nothing much to loose in the conference.
Both sides have interest in getting into communication with each other!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top