puredrifting
Major Contributor
So I am lying? If you checked my articles out, you would see that the last microphone article I wrote was in 2002, I write about a lot more than audio. I own and have used the Sennheiser MKH-60, K6/ME64/66/67 and an Audio-Technica 4073a for several years now, I have had no reason to even know that the Oktava existed until I began researching for this article. I'm not a professional sound mixer, I am just a guy who uses mics as I shoot.To suggest that you have been a member of this board since 2004 and have any interest in Oktava mikes or any mikes at all and claim to have not known about The Sound Room is really hard to believe.
You asked if it was your responsibility to go to all of the other sellers and find out what their story was. This is an extremely easy one to call. If you are going to write about them and make claims about them like you did about The Sound Room, then you bet your XLR you have a responsibility to check with them!
Basic journalism.
You're not an attorney, are you?
You still have not cited the specific claims I made about specific dealers other than I said that I didn't know what the situation was with the Okatavas were that the The Audio Room was selling. What else did I say about any dealers?
I am beginning to wonder what your motives are in pursuing this? To prove that I am a bad journalist? Okay dude, you win. I actually don't claim to be one, no journalism school or degee, I write mainly for fun and as a hobby. I stated my case, Paul stated his, readers of this thread will see how it resolved. Readers now know that there are at least two legitimate sources in the U.S. to buy an Oktava. My point was that I don't normally deal with even a mention of dealers in my articles, never have. You were the one that attacked because I hadn't.
It's over Kelly. Time to move on with life, there are more important things to deal with. I have a date with my pillow. G'night, sleep tight!
Dan