Apologies, wasn't trying to be rude. But you're right, my response was pretty condescending. I just see a lot of movement lately with m43 newbies diving into legacy glass without really knowing why, they just saw some cool pics on Flickr and thought they'd get them some of that old lens voodoo too, except when the lens arrives from eBay or craigslist and the very first shot isn't somehow sprinkled with cool vintage pixie dust, the lens gets tagged FAIL and then sits in a drawer unused. I personally know guys like this and it's a drag. But for all I know you're Ansel Adams so sorry for the proxy bile.
No worries, happens to the best of us.
Can someone tell me if my logic is correct that the Olympus 50mm has a different telephoto reach than a nikon or canon 50mm when mounted on the GH1? This confuses me for some reason.
One of the main reasons I shoot video with a dslr is so I can use wide angle lenses. I shoot rock climbing which is usually in tight quarters so being able to shoot wide is amazing. This is also the reason I'm using panasonic lenses is because the 7-14mm lens will allow me to capture a lot in small spaces and it also works well for closeups of the rock where you can still see the climber.
From what I'm reading, a new lens from any company would match up better with the Panasonic lenses than the FD's do. Sigma has a 30mm f/1.4 for $440, Canon has a 35mm f/2 for $300 and Nikon has a 35mm f/1.8 for $190. Due to the price and some reviews I've read, the Nikon looks like a good choice for me.
Thanks a lot for the help! It's hard making a lens decision alone!
Alex



