Kind of a longshot, but was wondering if any GH2 users out there have had a chance to compare these two. I'm in the market for a ultra-wide and was set on the Tokina as I have experience with it (stills only), but then found out about the Noktor a few weeks ago and have liked what I've seen so far. Curious as to the sharpness differences between the two. Any insight would be helpful.
GH2 Noktor 12mm VS Tokina 11-16mm For GH2
- Thread starter a.m.
- Start date
Rippie
Veteran
This won't answer your question but I literally just purchased the Tokina 10 mins ago.
Not having access to the lens I spent most of the morning researching it and it is pretty highly recommended across the web,
enough that I felt it was the way to go over other lens choices out there.
I look forward to trying it out.
Not having access to the lens I spent most of the morning researching it and it is pretty highly recommended across the web,
enough that I felt it was the way to go over other lens choices out there.
I look forward to trying it out.
David W. Jones
Veteran
The Noktor is faster but the Tokina is wider and covers more ground.
IMO, Investing in native M4/3 lenses is not a wise investment unless you plan on only sticking to that format with future cameras as well.
IMO, Investing in native M4/3 lenses is not a wise investment unless you plan on only sticking to that format with future cameras as well.
Did you buy the Nikon mount with a M43 adapter?