Barry_Green
Moderator
I don't set the schedule for the fests. I've just been asking for a shorter one forever. People complain about the six-minute time limit, but if we changed it to, say, 20 minutes -- it'd take like four days to watch all the entries! 
Whereas with a shorter time limit, it changes the whole type of story one would even attempt. You'd think about it differently. We've had people try to cram a 20-minute story into the six-minute runtime, and it just doesn't work at all. But with 2 minutes, nobody'd even try that (I hope). They'd recognize 2 minutes as its own art form.
The "On The Lot" comedies may have been mediocre, but those guys had a sixty-second time limit. Two minutes is twice as much time! :evil:
Anyway, I'd just like to see it shaken up a bit, get people thinking outside the box, and I think changing the shape of the box (i.e., drastically cutting the alloted runtime) would be enough of a change that it would really change the fest. We'd probably get a whole wave of new people entering, we'd get different types of films entered, etc.
Whereas with a shorter time limit, it changes the whole type of story one would even attempt. You'd think about it differently. We've had people try to cram a 20-minute story into the six-minute runtime, and it just doesn't work at all. But with 2 minutes, nobody'd even try that (I hope). They'd recognize 2 minutes as its own art form.
The "On The Lot" comedies may have been mediocre, but those guys had a sixty-second time limit. Two minutes is twice as much time! :evil:
Anyway, I'd just like to see it shaken up a bit, get people thinking outside the box, and I think changing the shape of the box (i.e., drastically cutting the alloted runtime) would be enough of a change that it would really change the fest. We'd probably get a whole wave of new people entering, we'd get different types of films entered, etc.