fromdecember
Member
I've been a graphic designer for quite a while and have always had an interest in video. I'm beginning to learn and study a lot about it, but there's one question I've recently thought about and cannot find the answer. I understand the 'craving' by some for RAW video because working with RAW pics verses compressed is a world of difference, especially in grading and correcting. I currently have a gh3, so my question is could I just do a "timelapse/sequence" of RAW pics and it would technically be the same as the video (minus audio)? Audio would be recorded separate anyway.
Just curious.
Just curious.