New Threads

rlm7189 said:
Not only do I agree with you completely, but I was also thinking about that kids thread when I first responded to THIS one. He's fantastic. I'm not a cynic, but he almost seems too good for his age. He says hes got a Photoshop DVD for sale...sign me up!.
Click to expand...

I bought the DVD plus I think that people like that shouldn't be allowed to live. Way too talented for his age. His stuff is almost surreal, but some of the best photography I have EVER seen.

-Jeremy
 
I feel like I'm driving by a car wreck trying not to look. I almost want to see it now. Oh wait, I said to ignore posts like that.
:huh:
 
As a relatively new member myself I think I would vote for erring on the side of permissive supervision rather than strict rules. If the battle against e-mail spam has taught us anything, it is that rules are easily hacked (and published rules even more so). If I can predict the results I can make a machine that gets me there. People are much harder to "hack" in this way, and thus much more effective at stopping people from "gaming" the system.

Furthermore, as a junior member I feel a certain amount of responsibility to answer redundant questions when I find them. Partly because I know what it's like to put something out there and not get any feedback, but mostly because I hope that it'll free up the experienced folks to respond more of the interesting posts :)

Thanks to the mods for doing such a great job and thanks to everyone here for creating and sustaining such a useful community!

Cheers,
Alden
 
we arnt gonna lock things down. They win if we do that. I remember that ever damn time I board a plane now after 9/11. They kinda won in a way cause it still is affecting us 5 years later.

So we will just deal with it as good as we can, If it becomes to big of a problem thats what lawyers are for. Thank god though for our incredible mods here though that do such an incredible job of keeping on top of things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top