Barry_Green
Moderator
It's been answered a hundred times before, but the simple answer is:
It could. If they'd wanted to install a DVCPRO-HD tape deck in it, it could record to tape. Of course, that would drive the price up by over $16,000 (the parts cost on a DVCPRO-HD tape mechanism) and would make the camera dramatically larger as well. And don't forget, DVCPRO-HD tapes are $46; we're talking about real HD tapes here, not $5 Wal-Mart tapes, so your tape cost would add up enormously as well.
I am certain that if enough customers ask for a tape-based HVX, and would be willing to pay the $22,000 cost for it, then they'll make it. Until then, the idea of using P2 (and shaving $16,000 off the camera's cost by doing so) looks like a very attractive alternative. It is because of P2 that this camera can exist at all, at the price point it's aimed at.
It could. If they'd wanted to install a DVCPRO-HD tape deck in it, it could record to tape. Of course, that would drive the price up by over $16,000 (the parts cost on a DVCPRO-HD tape mechanism) and would make the camera dramatically larger as well. And don't forget, DVCPRO-HD tapes are $46; we're talking about real HD tapes here, not $5 Wal-Mart tapes, so your tape cost would add up enormously as well.
I am certain that if enough customers ask for a tape-based HVX, and would be willing to pay the $22,000 cost for it, then they'll make it. Until then, the idea of using P2 (and shaving $16,000 off the camera's cost by doing so) looks like a very attractive alternative. It is because of P2 that this camera can exist at all, at the price point it's aimed at.