Barry_Green
Moderator
Nobody uses the term "crop factor" to mean 35 cine; I tried to get people to refer to that as the CCF (Cinema Crop Factor) but didn't get any traction. All camera manufacturers, that I can think of, when they mention "35mm equivalent", do so in terms of comparison against full-frame stills 35mm film.Crop factor can be so misleading. Which 35mm - full frame still or APS-C/Cine ?
If they were claiming a 7.2x crop factor off of APS-C/cine, then that would mean the camera has a sensor that's only 3mm wide, and that would be about a... what would that be, maybe a 1/6" sensor? So no, I don't think that's what they meant, they meant the crop as per 35mm stills film, and in that context it can only be, and must be, a 1/3" imaging size.
Either that, or the published focal length of the lens is wrong. Look at an EX1R, it has a 1/2" sensor and a published wide angle equivalence of about 30mm, and its lens is 5.8mm on the wide end. Bigger chips need more telephoto lenses, smaller chips need wider-angle lenses, to deliver the same field of view.
It's not rocket science here, it's just simple math. If the new 4K Sony cameras were legitimately using all of a 1/2.3" sensor, and they deliver a 29.5mm-equivalent field of view, then the lens would HAVE to have a wide-angle focal length of about 5.6mm. There is no other possibility.
So those of you who go to IBC next week and get a look at it, just look at the focal length on the lens. If it says 4.1-82mm, and Sony claims a wide-angle field of view equivalent to 29.5mm, then that's absolute definitive proof that it is using a 1/3" sensor size. If, on the other hand, the lens is market to be 5.6-112mm, then that would be proof that it's using the full 1/2.3" sensor.