legrevedotcom
Veteran
Those are good looking shots, but to me they're just too flat for food ("too flat for food" - need that on a t-shirt or something). No sparkle, deep blacks, the warm color balance is plugging things up. It's all very subjective, but food needs to be sensual and sexy. For me, it's usually hard light mixed with soft.
In the stills realm - before photoshop, it wasn't unusual to do dots and fingers of mild gels to do things like pop the green of a lime or add some pink to seafood skin. In motion that could be harder to pull off (but then there's motion tracking and masks to control that).
This looks pretty luscious… I also really like the flatter "rembrandt-ish" look with some muted colors that we're seeing in higher-end cookbooks (like this guy's work, yet there's a fair amount of hard light). And this shot isn't lit very hard but is really nice.
Just image-search "best food photography" and you'll see some gorgeous stuff (and some so-so…)
Those look great for a still photography, but you have to take into consideration the purpose of the video. If you are doing a receipe video, contrasty rembrandt looks can make it hard to translate what you are seeing. If you are selling mood and inspiration though, they are great. The reason is that when dealing with stills you have longer time to linger over the image, and you might not notice, but you will soon have spent 7-8 seconds going over a nicely composed contrasty still food image. I can't remember the last time I was allowed to linger 7-8 seconds on 1 food framing for video.

