My thoughts on the XHA1

disjecta

Lucky Duck
After shooting with an XLH1 for about nine months, I decided to sell it and buy an XHA1 instead. I can’t say I loved the attention I got when I went out with the XLH1. I spent a lot of time smiling and waving at people as they exclaimed “Wow, that’s a serious camera you’ve got there…” Also, the less “official” I look, the easier it is to shoot in a much broader variety of places. On top of all of that, the weight of the camera and the necessity of disassembling it when flying was all just a little too much. Selling it allowed me to get a camera much more akin to my beloved DVX100 and put some money back in the bank to boot.

When my camera arrived, the first thing I noticed was that it was small. It’s much smaller than I expected, in fact. I think it was partly due to my familiarity with the XLH1. In my mind, I was still expecting it to be in that size range. Now what I was looking at as I took it out of the box was more like a toy by comparison.

The next thing that surprised me was the weight of the camera. It was a little heavier than I expected and it also felt very solid. This pleased me greatly because it is pretty robust and that’s critical for me given I am out in the field quite a bit.

It felt well balanced although maybe a tad front heavy. I was able to quickly get up and running with all the controls because they were similarly placed to the XLH1. I was disappointed that I could not enable or disable the OIS from a button but had to go into a menu to change it. I switch the OIS on and off quite a bit so that was a significant loss. Also, I was not completely happy about having to search through the menu again to change the gain from 0 to -3 (which I do frequently). On the XLH1, that was also easy to change independent of the menu.

The instant focusing ability of the A1 is nothing short of spectacular. I never much used auto focus on the XLH1 but I am using it quite a bit on the A1. Mostly I set focus to manual and press the focus button for quick checks.

Having color bars so easily available is really nice. It’s one of those things that is very subtle but ends up being a great convenience.

The LCD, like the XLH1 is much brighter than what is being recorded to tape and can be deceiving. I always use zebra stripes as an exposure aid but sometimes can still be fooled by the LCD display, leaving me with underexposed and noisy footage. This is just something I need to watch out for. I haven’t tried playing with the brightness of the LCD although the brightness is an advantage on sunny days.

One thing that I find really annoying is when I have the camera slung over my shoulder using the strap. The white balance switch keeps getting moved and 75% of the time I have to switch it back to where it was.

The battery compartment, although a little odd compared to what I’m used to, doesn’t bother me at all. My 970’s fit in there and slip out without a problem.

Having an iris ring is such a thrill after the little thumbwheel of the XLH1 and it is surprisingly responsive and totally useable even when recording if I want to make a subtle adjustment. I got used to the position and feel of the focus, zoom and iris ring straight away so the whole design feels very intuitive to me.

The position preset focus/zoom switches occupy a huge amount of prime real estate on the camera and it seems such a novelty function to me. I’m a little confused as to why Canon didn’t use this space for at least an OIS button instead, something I would use a hundred times more.

Without going into every physical attribute of the camera let me just say that I find the entire design very logical. Even hunting around for something I hadn’t yet used on the camera while recording, I was able to put my finger right on what I needed.

Even though Canon basically said that the XHA1 and the XLH1 would record the same quality picture, I was a little nervous that there would be something different. I spent some time working on getting the picture from the H1 just perfect to where I loved the colors, etc. I was relieved and thrilled to see that the picture quality matched and I was still able to produce quality footage in a smaller and lighter package. The noise level is significantly lower than what I experienced on my DVX. In fact, the noise the XHA1 produces is much more like fine film grain than the dancing digital dots I’ve seen on some HVX and DVX footage in low light.

All in all I would say that this is the best camera I have ever used. It is absolutely ideal for my shooting style which is usually out in the elements shooting nature footage. The form factor is right as is the weight and positioning of all of the controls. As mentioned earlier, I would like an OIS switch and the sensitivity of the white balance switch is a minor annoyance.

Canon has done a spectacular job squeezing such a great HD image onto a miniDV tape. I have noticed some occasional macroblocking in high motion scenes but it’s really very minor and not something I am worried about at all. It’s the kind of thing that is only visible through close inspection of still frames, not while watching the footage, even on a 50” plasma.

Do I miss my XLH1? Hell no.
 
Man alive, I posted that about 3 seconds ago :)

No plans to buy any more equipment. I am done for the foreseeable future, just gonna get out there and start shooting.
 
disjecta said:
Man alive, I posted that about 3 seconds ago :)

No plans to buy any more equipment. I am done for the foreseeable future, just gonna get out there and start shooting.

There, I waited to post this time. =P I should be following your mantra. Sadly, I have to wait for actors, etc., before I can shoot.

Have fun!
 
"I was relieved and thrilled to see that the picture quality matched and I was still able to produce quality footage in a smaller and lighter package. "

psst...it is even better in some circumstances... and the kelvin step white balance is a dream.
 
Great post, D. Glad the camera has fulfilled your expectations as I know you were quite nervous that something would be lost in translation going from the H1 to A1.

I knew you'd love it. :)
 
Great to hear! So glad your on this side of the fence now as I know how meticulous you are and will post things that I dont bother to look for (amazing presets for one). Seriously having you and Elton around is, well it makes my life much easier - even though what we shoot is worlds apart.

I am seriously happy some of the old (not in age) experienced users of the DVX cru are here. What xray said about the Kelvin adjustability is very true. And am totally with you on the OIS. Pain in the ass that one.
 
I capture my footage using either Vegas 7 or Premiere Pro (my preference). I also use Cineform's "Aspect HD" plugin to create robust intermediary files instead of flimsy m2t's.
 
Hey thanks D. Your review has me thinking about the XHA1.
What I meant was do you use a deck or the camera for capture? HDV decks are pricey as I recall.
 
ncje said:
I am seriously happy some of the old (not in age) experienced users of the DVX cru are here. What xray said about the Kelvin adjustability is very true. And am totally with you on the OIS. Pain in the ass that one.

Old in age too... 2007 is a remarkable year, made my first funded film "one moment" in 1987...
 
Michael_Richard said:
Hey thanks D. Your review has me thinking about the XHA1.
What I meant was do you use a deck or the camera for capture? HDV decks are pricey as I recall.

Oh, I see....I am just using the camera itself for now.

Both the HV10 and HV20 from Canon can be used as a deck for the XHA1
 
By the way, one of the other things I've heard from people who are on the fence about getting an XHA1, especially those coming from the DVX world, is that Canon's colors are flat. While this is true out of the box, the possibility is there to tweak the settings to the point that they come close to the intensity of the DVX and/or HVX. I think some people may have been misled by the pictures in Barry Green's article. Clearly, the HVX looks like it has superior color.

As I've mentioned in the PRESETS thread, I am currently working on a preset that will give users the choice to shoot with colors that approach that of the Panny cameras.

Here are two stills from a test I did yesterday using this "work in progress" preset called VIVIDRGB:

windmill2.jpg


windmill1.jpg
 
Disjecta, do you really live in the same part of the Planet that I do, because I have nothing like that anywhere near my house :)
 
The HVX - XHA1 are different in color rendition, you can match up in some circumstances but the difference in lighting remains. The XH-a1 is more detailed in the wide shot and gives a different 'feel' to the image. The HVX is more powerful in the color in superb light situations. Generally you can say red to canon green to hvx. I did matched up the HVX in the same range as the XHA1 during editing. I build some presets that helps.

Personally I think the HVX (in studio light) particular is somewhat 'artificial'. If you look back in the time the HVX was introduced, that was my first opinion. Like a good 3D animation, its intelligent use of 8bit CLUTS.
 
Nice shot :)

I agree that the HVX or DVX should not be held as some kind of standard in color rendition. They both have a unique feel about them but they are not the be all and end all and it doesn't mean that other cameras cannot be better or the same. The main things that appealed to me about my DVX was the vivid color (which I can approximate with the XHA1) and the organic feel to the picture (which the XHA1 absolutely has for me).
 
Back
Top