my experience making my first low-budget feature

Well OldCorpse, it's already been well-established in previous threads/posts that we see eye to eye on almost nothing where all of this is concerned, but how you can take a 'just do it' stance on shooting a film in general at the same time as what amounts to a 'just give up' stance on collaborating with a screenwriter (especially with writing being roel z's self-admitted shortcoming) is completely beyond me. It's as though you're saying that young, talented writers (that are as yet 'off the radar' in terms of larger success) simply don't exist. Nothing could be further from the truth. After all, every single successful screenwriter started out as a complete nobody. Aspiring, and yes even highly talented screenwriters are surprisingly easily found at places like...well...here, as well as other sites like zoetrope.com, triggerstreet.com and lots of other places. And the notion that one shouldn't try to collaborate with them because they all "want to direct their own stuff" or are "already professionals making $$$ in Hollywood" is utter hogwash.

In addition to many lively discussions right here on screenwriting, I participate regularly on zoetrope.com. The way it works is that for me to get reviews of one of my scripts, I must read and submit reviews of four others among a list of a dozen or so the site creates for me. I've submitted four scripts so far, which means that I've been required to read and review 16 (and I've read a number of others that weren't required). A significant number of these were very well written IMHO (especially shorts, which attract fewer starry-eyed delusional types). Quite a few have won signifcant screenwriting competitions. And having looked up the profiles of these folks, it's clear that like screenwriters everywhere, many of them have next to no aspirations as director/shooters. In very substantial part they're *just writers*; that's what they *do*. And it's not a requirement on zoe, if one isn't looking for reviews on their own writing, to review any scripts at all. You can simply sign up and read any script that's posted there. You can easily communicate with the writers by internal "Z-Mail" (like a PM here), to engage in a discussion of their interest in having you make one of their scripts into a film. Like most writers, they tend to have more scripts than they could ever possibly film, *even if they wanted to do so*. And like many writers, they'd be thrilled to have *someone else* do it.

Right here on DVXuser there are numereous good writers winning "Scriptfests" in addition to posting in forums, and most have back-catalogs of other scripts. Alex Whitmer, a very talented guy who's posted here extensively and won at least one Scriptfest (maybe more), has literally dozens, if not hundreds of completed scripts. I've read a few of 'em. He's very good. And he's *completely* open to writing for other fillmmakers, or having them produce one of his existing scripts. That's just *one* example of someone I know of personally. There are *many* others.

Any smart team-player seeks out others to do what he's less suited for, and filmmaking is the very definition of a team effort. Does every great actor insist on writing and directing his own films? Of course not, although a few do. Same thing with writers. They need shooters, directors, producers, etc. just as much as actors do...

To actively dissuade a self-described 'highly writing-challenged' filmmaker from seeking others who specialize in that very thing, when such individuals (at least at a similar skill level to the individual in question's ability as a filmmaker, if not higher) are out there waiting to help, is perhaps the worst piece of advice I've ever seen put forth on this or any other forum. To do so in the same breath as saying said filmmaker should go ahead and make a film anyway (and "learn to write better" - yikes - the guy *admits* he stinks at it), given the cost to make a film in blood, sweat, and cash, elevates an irresponsible position to the metaphoric equivalent of "Don't worry - just jump out of the plane - you'll have plenty of time to figure out all that parachute business on the way down."

Shame on you.

Here's another realistic thing. Good writers are rare. Rare. I have all the respect in the world for the writers on DVXuser, but I'm just being real with you - it's very, very, very rare. Guess what the odds are you'll find one, who is not going to want to direct his own stuff. Also: if he's really good, he's already a professional who is making $$$ in Hollywood. So you want to find a really good writer who is great, but somehow can't get work in Hollywood, and doesn't want to direct, but is happy to choose YOU - of all the directors in the world - to collaborate on a script?

I'm not saying this to be negative. I'm saying this to be real, because I respect you enough to tell you this. You may end up wasting a lot of time looking for a writer and end up with not much to show for it.

What I'm getting at, is that sometimes life deals us unpleasant options. You may have no option. You can gamble on getting a great writer - but the truth is, you are unlikely to succeed at that. So, you do what you have to do. When you have no access to a great writer, what will you do - not shoot the movie, ever, or write it yourself? Yes, you may not be very good, but then, the solution is not to get another weak writer, but to get better yourself. You must get better at writing.

That's the most efficient option, in my humble opinion. I believe this is the only realistic way. It's better to think about that now, instead of wasting a lot of time - maybe years - looking for a great writer.
 
Last edited:
+1

We see exactly the same problems all the time with Hollywood features costing hundreds of millions - if you don't have a great script (with great characters and plot), you've got nothing. There's nothing anyone can do during production or post-production to fix script problems.
 
If you have not read it yet, buy Directing Actors by Judith Weston. It is my bible when I direct and one of the greatest filmmaking resources, in my opinion, and others here will agree.

Absolutely. IMO it should be required reading for any aspiring director. It's been lauded by more other authors in their books and materials on all aspects of filmmaking than I can count. Ms. Weston has given all of us a tremendous gift.
 
i personally like things spicing up around the thread, as long as it's not entirely serious.
i guess OldCorpse had some rough moment trying to write or collaborate, whatever..

anyway, Ted, as you mentioned above, i still like to try and find some short scripts writers who actually don't want to direct.
i've checked the trigger street forum and started reviewing there, even left a thread with my questions.. but it looks a bit slow down there.
so you're saying that at zoetrope.com i might find more resources?
btw- i'm still trying to find some older scripfests to read and give my thoughts on, but it seems impossible to find or download any of them..
is it "secret"? or it's just that they deleted past URL's?
and what about this Alex Whitmer? should i contact him about collaborating?
 
btw- i'm still trying to find some older scripfests to read and give my thoughts on, but it seems impossible to find or download any of them..
is it "secret"? or it's just that they deleted past URL's?

The first 8 scriptfests can be seen here:

http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/forumdisplay.php?135-Previous-ScriptFests

and what about this Alex Whitmer? should i contact him about collaborating?

Go here:

http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/search.php

...and search on his name. You'll find a long list of his posts, which are well worth reading. Simply click on his name in any one of them and you'll be able to send a PM to him. He's a very friendly guy, loves screenwriting (and movies of course), and I'll bet he'll be more than happy to help you out in one way or another. Please say hi to him for me, and tell him I steered you his way.

And please keep us posted on your progress. Best of luck to you!

EDIT: Alex was third place in Scriptfest I and won Scriptfest II.
 
Last edited:
Before taking on the feature problems why don't we talk about the "trailer"? Is it telling the story you intended (i hope not as i don't see any viable story), is it setting up the mood you had in mind (again i hope not as the mood simply ins't there as the music has very disjointed felling to the images and the images lack formal rigidness of a moody piece)? Now because of the formal shortcoming you might be forced to "settle" on telling just a story and for that you need to know:
a.) what story am i telling? (a guy going a trip to find an abandon house that he keeps on obsessing about? if so is this story interesting enough?)
b.) what am i "hiding" behind this story? (if this is indeed the story i'm trying to tell why am i attracted to it and thus what's the actual essence of the film?) This answer will allow you to see "bigger" picture of your film (if there is one or if you can find it)

Then you can go back and ask, why is the piece not as moody as i'd hoped for? Would more unique lighting, framing, camera moves, characters, atmospheric effects bring that mood atmosphere i'm after for (since you mentioned Lynch)? Am i capable of creating all the visual splendor or would i be better served to hire a pro DP?

You mention that:
"the main reason to take this lonely rout was to be able to be limitless in my thoughts, actions, decisions and feelings."

But isn't the lone gunner actually working against it? Instead of thinking about the scene you think about the scheduling issues, instead of acting out this scene you make the calls to confirm your next location, instead of deciding on where to place the camera now you have to decide on what time to break for lunch instead of introducing feeling into your frame you shoot most basic coverage possible within you time constrains...
 
Well OldCorpse, it's already been well-established in previous threads/posts that we see eye to eye on almost nothing where all of this is concerned, but how you can take a 'just do it' stance on shooting a film in general at the same time as what amounts to a 'just give up' stance on collaborating with a screenwriter (especially with writing being roel z's self-admitted shortcoming) is completely beyond me. It's as though you're saying that young, talented writers (that are as yet 'off the radar' in terms of larger success) simply don't exist. Nothing could be further from the truth. After all, every single successful screenwriter started out as a complete nobody. Aspiring, and yes even highly talented screenwriters are surprisingly easily found at places like...well...here, as well as other sites like zoetrope.com, triggerstreet.com and lots of other places. And the notion that one shouldn't try to collaborate with them because they all "want to direct their own stuff" or are "already professionals making $$$ in Hollywood" is utter hogwash.

[...] A LOT OF STUFF [...]

Shame on you.

Ted, we've gone round and round in the past, but I am not going to engage you anymore because after the last time I've been cautioned by a mod, and so don't feel like I can take a risk to ruffle your feathers with a differing point of view.

It is entirely obvious that as usual you understood nothing of my post. Nothing. Fine. This is not about me or you. This is about roeiz and his path forward, so there is no sense in derailing this thread by you and I going back and forth.

I've put my view forward, and so have you. Roeiz will take from this what he feels will benefit him. Sometimes people are not ready to hear certain kind of advice, because they are so focused on a different outlook. If that's the case with roeiz, then he'll discard my advice. I absolutely stand by it. Time will tell. On that note, however, time is something that's limited for all of us.

And I end it not by saying "shame on you" - because I'm sure you are sincere in your advice. Just as I am. And there is no shame in offering the best advice you have. Good luck!
 
Before taking on the feature problems why don't we talk about the "trailer"? Is it telling the story you intended (i hope not as i don't see any viable story), is it setting up the mood you had in mind (again i hope not as the mood simply ins't there as the music has very disjointed felling to the images and the images lack formal rigidness of a moody piece)? Now because of the formal shortcoming you might be forced to "settle" on telling just a story and for that you need to know:
a.) what story am i telling? (a guy going a trip to find an abandon house that he keeps on obsessing about? if so is this story interesting enough?)
b.) what am i "hiding" behind this story? (if this is indeed the story i'm trying to tell why am i attracted to it and thus what's the actual essence of the film?) This answer will allow you to see "bigger" picture of your film (if there is one or if you can find it)

Then you can go back and ask, why is the piece not as moody as i'd hoped for? Would more unique lighting, framing, camera moves, characters, atmospheric effects bring that mood atmosphere i'm after for (since you mentioned Lynch)? Am i capable of creating all the visual splendor or would i be better served to hire a pro DP?

You mention that:
"the main reason to take this lonely rout was to be able to be limitless in my thoughts, actions, decisions and feelings."

But isn't the lone gunner actually working against it? Instead of thinking about the scene you think about the scheduling issues, instead of acting out this scene you make the calls to confirm your next location, instead of deciding on where to place the camera now you have to decide on what time to break for lunch instead of introducing feeling into your frame you shoot most basic coverage possible within you time constrains...

very well said, thanks.
may i add some thoughts-
it's definitely not a "Trailer" !! it's just a bunch of shots i chose to represent some kind of footage that came out well.
if it was a trailer, it would of course tell a story, put in some dialog, keep the viewer want more, and so in..
i didn't even been able to reach the "trailer" stage because my carriage in front of horses situation.
what i meant about the advantage of being alone (i forgot to mention hiring a very efficient on set producer),
is that i had the chance to direct some on set promos, and i simply HATE a big functioning set vibe.
i must must must create an intimate workplace for most of the shooting process.
if it means writing a script that will take it under extreme consideration, then that's the price.
i hope you understand what i mean.
in this day and age i think there's a small place for those kind of productions.
am i wrong?
 
Ted, we've gone round and round in the past, but I am not going to engage you anymore because after the last time I've been cautioned by a mod, and so don't feel like I can take a risk to ruffle your feathers with a differing point of view.

It is entirely obvious that as usual you understood nothing of my post. Nothing. Fine. This is not about me or you. This is about roeiz and his path forward, so there is no sense in derailing this thread by you and I going back and forth.

I've put my view forward, and so have you. Roeiz will take from this what he feels will benefit him. Sometimes people are not ready to hear certain kind of advice, because they are so focused on a different outlook. If that's the case with roeiz, then he'll discard my advice. I absolutely stand by it. Time will tell. On that note, however, time is something that's limited for all of us.

And I end it not by saying "shame on you" - because I'm sure you are sincere in your advice. Just as I am. And there is no shame in offering the best advice you have. Good luck!

OldCorpse, listen,
what if i told you that at the moment, i consider myself about 70% a "tool man" in making a film, and that i DO have some good original "core" ideas, some basic moments that someone can build a whole story around, or, let's say "patents" that have good enough potential.
however, i did try many times to extract them onto bigger scripts, but i'll be truly happy and engaged into letting someone invest himself into the writing process or read a script that will make me click into it and just make it.
you claim it's almost impossible to do at where i am, and Ted claims it's very possible.
i can tell you, as a 38 years old horse, i did try to write some scripts and now this is where i am..
i don't think it'll take more than a month finding out if there's any potential of collaborating.
who knows? at least it's a road i DIDN'T try yet.

* do feel free to derail folks, you have my blessing :)
 
Roei, I had good reasons to write what I wrote. Basically, it's a unique situation when you're trying to establish yourself. There are the odds of success as I outlined - the odds are already very, very small to get a career like a Tarantino/Aronofsky/Smith etc., but they become almost vanishing when you have to name all those who managed to do so based on a script by someone other than themselves. It's not like it NEVER happens. It can happen - example: James Wan collaborated on Saw with Leigh Whannell (both did the story, Whannell did the script) - now, Saw is not everyone's cup of tea (I liked the first one very much, hated the rest), but undoubtedly it launched James Wan (though it remains to be seen how far he goes). So my point is, odds of doing it that way is really shooting for remote odds.

Why did I advise working on yourself as a script writer? Not only because of the aforementioned. Also because of a psychological effect. When you collaborate with a writer, certain avenues of growth are closed on purely psychological grounds. You come to rely (subconsciously) on the writer, instead of growing yourself. There's this apocryphal story about how the Romans conquered Britain: when the Roman Legions landed on the shore, the commander ordered the ships to be burned. The only way to survive was to win. Do you see? That's what happens to your brain when confronted with a stark situation - it finds a way, and you grow. But if there is the least way out, like another writer - the brain is happy to stop growing, because growing beyond your apparent limits can be very painful.

Here's what I see: you'll spend a lot of time finding and working with a writer. Odds that he'll come up with something that will launch your career, is remote - see the examples I gave above. At the end of the process, you will still not have a career, and more importantly, you will not grow as a director.

That is the background to my post - some people will understand this, some (as you can easily see) are too filled with hate and too limited to understand what I'm getting at. The issue is a lot deeper than it seems on the surface, but of course, sadly, some will not grasp it and instead attack me based on their own limitations - their loss.

My advice remains - watch movies and read scripts and analyze and write.

Why not go ahead and find a writer and collaborate? Because there's the danger you'll get sucked in by a very psychologically seductive mirage. You'll think you are going somewhere and keep going and going and going, like chasing that pool of water in the desert that seems to be just about ahead... again, and again, and again. The brain plays tricks on you.

Anyhow, that's my advice. Is it possible? Yes - see James Wan and Leigh Whannell. But it is also possible to win the lottery. When given a choice, I go to work to make my money, rather than invest in a lottery ticket. But hey, maybe you're lucky :)... so I end, with: good luck!
 
I've had a 30+ year successful career in the arts, working with extremely famous and not-so-famous actors, film directors, artists and musical performers, among others. I've seen quite a few of them go from complete obscurity to great fame. In my professional opinion, the above advice is disempowering rubbish. Sorry...
 
OldCorpse,
i perfectly understand your angle, and to prove it:
if Beethoven collaborated with others, most chances he could have been infamous and we could listen to those average compositions today, instead of genius ones, right?
that may be the case when let's say, 2 writers write one story.
but when a director develop a very good script, with his base of a brilliant idea, together with a writer,
the director can elevate the story himself onto his own genius vision while making it. and that's without the writer.
what say you?
 
When you collaborate with a writer, more is involved than simply putting your best efforts together. It's a skill, first. You must have the ability to judge what to take and what to leave. How to get the best out of a writer. Not everyone is good at that. There are directors who are great at getting good work out of writers (just as there are directors who are great at eliciting fantastic performances from an actor). It is my opinion that when you are just starting out the situation is very different than when you are an already established director collaborating with a writer. Very different. A director has the ultimate responsibility for the film. That means you sometimes must ask for a lot, because unfortunately that's what it will take to get what you want. When you are an established director, the writer trusts you in a way that s/he may not when you have no credits to your name - and that affects their work and their collaboration. Not even consciously, but subconsciously. And it depends on how much they themselves can accomplish. To give another example from a different field: Apple and Jobs. If you read the recent authorized biography (which I recommend), you'll see plenty of examples of how individual engineers did things they never believed they could accomplish because Steve Jobs asked them to. If it was just any old CEO, they would not have done so, but it was the legend Steve Jobs - the pioneer of personal computers - who had the credibility to ask. They did things for him they themselves didn't know they could. Steve Jobs, because of his credentials was able to get engineers to perform at the very top of their game - something you can't get without those credentials. Which is why you'll see more directors collaborate with writers or direct their material once they are successful, compared to the number who do their first effort trying to establish themselves.

Now again, it's always possible - there are exceptions. Take Polanski, who collaborated with Skolimowski on Knife In The Water - Skolimowski co-wrote it with Polanski (and became a director in his own right) and Polanski directed. They were from the same film school. There are examples of people who worked with close friends or were just starting out together in a special situation - so it's possible, it's just rare. Are you going to work closely like that with someone from Israel, or are you doing it through email?

It is my opinion, that while anything is possible, it's best to pick roads that are most likely to lead to success, without too many detours. But everyone has their own path. We can give advice, based on our understanding of how the world works, but people are different, and there are always exceptions. So, I don't mean to stop you from doing what you believe in. Choose the advice that speaks to you. I just give my point of view (a "rubbish" point of view, according to some), but only you can know if any given advice is right for you and your situation, because only you know yourself and your situation the best. Again: good luck!
 
Maybe my English is not good enough to understand, why this discussion became so over-heated: A young director should trust an established writer as much as a young writer should trust an established director. Established director working with established writer - no need to discuss anything (other than they may have a bad idea together).

Young director working with young writer - minefield. But, maybe, worth to try to cross it. At a certain point you have to take chances. But you need people around you to at least help you to find out if you are about to jump onto a ton of dynamite. Especially if you want to be both writer & director. Then it's like crossing a minefield with a barrel of nitroglycerine in your arms. Thrilling. If you survive - good. If not - kaboom.

About the "genius" factor - don't make this part of your calculation. Most directors and writers or writers/directors are extremely good craftsmen first and foremost. Whenever people talk about writing and directing in such an idealistic way I start becoming sceptical. The point in writer / director collaboration is: You never ever win against a badly constructed script. Never. Every thing you may try as a director is only fireworks, helping your movie over the first twenty minutes and then it starts sinking. But, yes: Some people are indeed extremely good story-teller but can not write very good.

So, your only chance is, that

a) you find a writer you trust and like to work with and who has the ability to bring your ideas into a working dramatical construction (or, even better, does what good writers are expected to do - alter an idea way beyond what even you may have imagined first).
b) you yourself are the writer and you have some people helping you to find the weak points in your script (first rule: If you think there are no weak points they most probably are so big, you just don't see them).
c) you really have a Polanski-like ability to "see" things (but are keyboard-averse or whatever) and use a writer as just a crutch.

c is the most unlikely - but: Who knows? In the end it is your personal decision and your personal fate what kind of cinematic animal you want to become and what reality has to say about that. Either way you may become airborne or go down in flames like the "Hindenburg". So: Take both oldcorpse's and Ted's advice, juggle it, make a decision an then off you go and either become a "genial" film-maker or a working professional in the world of the moving picture or minced meat.

But: If you ever underestimate not so much "the writer" but what the process of writing is about - the simulation of a future movie, imho - you will go down. And this not so much thundering and in flames but with a whimper.
 
thanks tipota for your extra tips.
i still am very confused about all this.
hope some clear thoughts will come up soon.
it's not that i got many talented writes sending me replies...
 
it's not that i got many talented writes sending me replies...

There are not many talented writers to begin with. And there never will be.

You have to search for the one that you can make interested in whatever you want to do because most probably you can't really pay him/her. Alternatively: You write yourself and have lot's of people around you who give you friendly criticism and good advice.

Those are the options. I know of none other.
 
Back
Top