wgzn
Veteran
i'm a long term hpx170 user considering selling and getting a dvx200.
have done a small bit of hands-on with it at demos. and for the most part, i liked it... it seemed like a logical next step forward...
my situation:
mostly corporate and business-profile and business-event (often ENG style) work.
i do very little (not even 10% of my deliverables) "cinematic" or youtube / shorts / indie-feature / music video kind of work.
my typical workflow for a corporate video is shoot the interview(s) on a 5d3. then b-roll (which usually calls for slow, servo-zooms, wildly dynamic sound and other things not best suited to DSLRS) with my hpx170. this works fine. but having to address two completely different camera setups makes shoot days a little clumsy.
my primary goals are two-fold:
1. with the [slightly] shallower DOF of the dvx200 i might be able to eliminate the 5d3?
2. shoot longer events to SD cards instead of having to jockey P2 cards (usually requiring an assistant to offload while i continue shooting)
the 4k of the dvx i'm sure will be handy. but it's not really a selling point. but getting a more up to date camera IS.
QUESTIONS:
1. are folks more or less happy with the dvx? are there features that improve your day? or am i just buying into more headaches?
2. shooting well-lit chroma (internally to cards) will the 4:2:0 of the dvx be truly (NOTICEABLY to the common business customer) problematic compared to the 4:2:2 of the hpx?
i know this is kind of a lazy post. and i could probably find the answers by reading various forum posts. i was just looking to get a "30k' view" without a lot of niggling about.
have done a small bit of hands-on with it at demos. and for the most part, i liked it... it seemed like a logical next step forward...
my situation:
mostly corporate and business-profile and business-event (often ENG style) work.
i do very little (not even 10% of my deliverables) "cinematic" or youtube / shorts / indie-feature / music video kind of work.
my typical workflow for a corporate video is shoot the interview(s) on a 5d3. then b-roll (which usually calls for slow, servo-zooms, wildly dynamic sound and other things not best suited to DSLRS) with my hpx170. this works fine. but having to address two completely different camera setups makes shoot days a little clumsy.
my primary goals are two-fold:
1. with the [slightly] shallower DOF of the dvx200 i might be able to eliminate the 5d3?
2. shoot longer events to SD cards instead of having to jockey P2 cards (usually requiring an assistant to offload while i continue shooting)
the 4k of the dvx i'm sure will be handy. but it's not really a selling point. but getting a more up to date camera IS.
QUESTIONS:
1. are folks more or less happy with the dvx? are there features that improve your day? or am i just buying into more headaches?
2. shooting well-lit chroma (internally to cards) will the 4:2:0 of the dvx be truly (NOTICEABLY to the common business customer) problematic compared to the 4:2:2 of the hpx?
i know this is kind of a lazy post. and i could probably find the answers by reading various forum posts. i was just looking to get a "30k' view" without a lot of niggling about.