tbirdparis
Member
Hi all,
I found an offer on eBay here in France (not a private seller, a retailer) for a Canon FD 1.4 50mm S.C.C lens including an adapter ring for M 4/3 for 175€ (around $US230). In the description the seller does seem to say the adapter ring allows you to adjust the aperture but I'd obviously confirm this by contacting them before selling. They claim it's in excellent nick with no scratches, zero fungus and perfectly clean.
I'd love to hear from anyone who uses/has used this particular lens on a GH1 or GH2. I'm not a pro and far from an expert, so from my research I've pretty much understood that a lot of people really like the combination of Micro 4/3 bodies with classic lenses such as the Canon FDs. I'm not sure what the "S.C.C" refers to, is it a particular series or does it have something different about it to other FD 1.4 50mms?
The reason I'm attracted to this lens is because I'm looking for something way faster than the kit lens that came with my camera (the 14-140) which is the only lens I own. It's fine for shooting outside in parks on a summer's day and whatever, but that's totally not the kind of shooting I'm interested in. I want to be able to shoot in as low light as possible, and also (yes I know, not very original) I want to be able to get a very reduced depth of field for nice subject isolation and blurred backgrounds using an ND filter. Also I've found that with my GH1 (hacked), ISO's from 800 upwards are pretty much useless for video because I get awful FPN and noise. So a fast lens seems to be what I need. Also I don't care about things like autofocus, nor in-lens stabilization. Am more interested in getting a nice vintage look, am happy to focus manually and I am able to get stable enough stuff using tripods (and some stabilization correction in FCP X as needed).
I've used a Voitgländer Nokton 50mm before, which I hired for a weekend. I really loved it and would buy one in a flash. However, it seems that the waiting list is long, and also I find it hard to justify spending over 700€ on a lens like that when I'm definitely not a pro. How do you think this Canon would compare to the Nokton? Obviously it's slightly slower so it won't be quite so crazy bright in low light, but for the price it seems like a decent compromise for someone like me.
Last question. I'm not sure I really understand exactly how the crop factor thing comes into it when you use a non M 4/3 lens with an adaptor. I've read explanations about this around the place, but because I don't have any real training in photography I'm unclear on what it actually boils down to. The seller says that on a M 4/3 body, this lens becomes a 100mm equivalent. So does this mean in practical terms, it will be wider angle or more narrow than what the Nokton was? This isn't of huge importance to me because I'm pretty much just looking to mess around with experimental imagery - again I'm not a pro looking to make actual films where you know when you need a prime or a pancake or macro or whatever for particular things. For me it's just the low-light performance I need and as far as field of view goes, I'll just make do with what it does. But I'd like to understand it a bit better anyway.
So, any opinions and input will be warmly welcomed. Is this lens and adaptor combo a reasonable deal, price-wise? I'll be wanting to get a vari ND filter to go with it - I really got used to having that extra ring of variable ND when I used the Nokton (as opposed to switchable fixed NDs), so that's an additional cost I need to factor in. If anyone can suggest a good vari ND that fits this lens, I'd appreciate any recommendations!
Cheers!
oh yeah last thing: Obviously I'm looking at this lens/adaptor combo primarily for video use, mostly 720p AVCHD @50fps (using lpowell hacks) and almost never for photos. But I'm also into timelapse/stop motion so it would probably get a bit of use set up with a tripod and intervalometer shooting the streets of Paris at night. So if you guys think there's a wiser choice for me in this price range, don't hold back!
I found an offer on eBay here in France (not a private seller, a retailer) for a Canon FD 1.4 50mm S.C.C lens including an adapter ring for M 4/3 for 175€ (around $US230). In the description the seller does seem to say the adapter ring allows you to adjust the aperture but I'd obviously confirm this by contacting them before selling. They claim it's in excellent nick with no scratches, zero fungus and perfectly clean.
I'd love to hear from anyone who uses/has used this particular lens on a GH1 or GH2. I'm not a pro and far from an expert, so from my research I've pretty much understood that a lot of people really like the combination of Micro 4/3 bodies with classic lenses such as the Canon FDs. I'm not sure what the "S.C.C" refers to, is it a particular series or does it have something different about it to other FD 1.4 50mms?
The reason I'm attracted to this lens is because I'm looking for something way faster than the kit lens that came with my camera (the 14-140) which is the only lens I own. It's fine for shooting outside in parks on a summer's day and whatever, but that's totally not the kind of shooting I'm interested in. I want to be able to shoot in as low light as possible, and also (yes I know, not very original) I want to be able to get a very reduced depth of field for nice subject isolation and blurred backgrounds using an ND filter. Also I've found that with my GH1 (hacked), ISO's from 800 upwards are pretty much useless for video because I get awful FPN and noise. So a fast lens seems to be what I need. Also I don't care about things like autofocus, nor in-lens stabilization. Am more interested in getting a nice vintage look, am happy to focus manually and I am able to get stable enough stuff using tripods (and some stabilization correction in FCP X as needed).
I've used a Voitgländer Nokton 50mm before, which I hired for a weekend. I really loved it and would buy one in a flash. However, it seems that the waiting list is long, and also I find it hard to justify spending over 700€ on a lens like that when I'm definitely not a pro. How do you think this Canon would compare to the Nokton? Obviously it's slightly slower so it won't be quite so crazy bright in low light, but for the price it seems like a decent compromise for someone like me.
Last question. I'm not sure I really understand exactly how the crop factor thing comes into it when you use a non M 4/3 lens with an adaptor. I've read explanations about this around the place, but because I don't have any real training in photography I'm unclear on what it actually boils down to. The seller says that on a M 4/3 body, this lens becomes a 100mm equivalent. So does this mean in practical terms, it will be wider angle or more narrow than what the Nokton was? This isn't of huge importance to me because I'm pretty much just looking to mess around with experimental imagery - again I'm not a pro looking to make actual films where you know when you need a prime or a pancake or macro or whatever for particular things. For me it's just the low-light performance I need and as far as field of view goes, I'll just make do with what it does. But I'd like to understand it a bit better anyway.
So, any opinions and input will be warmly welcomed. Is this lens and adaptor combo a reasonable deal, price-wise? I'll be wanting to get a vari ND filter to go with it - I really got used to having that extra ring of variable ND when I used the Nokton (as opposed to switchable fixed NDs), so that's an additional cost I need to factor in. If anyone can suggest a good vari ND that fits this lens, I'd appreciate any recommendations!
Cheers!
oh yeah last thing: Obviously I'm looking at this lens/adaptor combo primarily for video use, mostly 720p AVCHD @50fps (using lpowell hacks) and almost never for photos. But I'm also into timelapse/stop motion so it would probably get a bit of use set up with a tripod and intervalometer shooting the streets of Paris at night. So if you guys think there's a wiser choice for me in this price range, don't hold back!